Suppr超能文献

射血分数恢复的心力衰竭患者的一级预防植入型心律转复除颤器治疗。

Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2021 May;27(5):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

Given recent advances in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies for improving outcomes related to chronic systolic heart failure, heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is now recognized as a distinct clinical entity with increasing prevalence. In many patients who once had an indication for active implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, questions remain regarding the usefulness of this primary prevention strategy to protect against syncope and cardiac arrest after they have achieved myocardial recovery. Early, small studies provide convincing evidence for continued guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in segments of the HFrecEF population to promote persistent left ventricular myocardial recovery. Retrospective data suggest that the risk of sudden cardiac death is lower, but still present, in HFrecEF as compared with HF with reduced ejection fraction, with reports of up to 5 appropriate ICD therapies delivered per 100 patient-years. The usefulness of continued ICD therapy is weighed against the unfavorable effects of this strategy, which include a cumulative risk of infection, inappropriate discharge, and patient-level anxiety. Historically, many surrogate measures for risk stratification have been explored, but few have demonstrated efficacy and widespread availability. We found that the available data to inform decisions surrounding the continued use of active ICD therapies in this population are incomplete, and more advanced tools such as genetic testing, evaluation of high-risk structural cardiomyopathies (such as noncompaction), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have emerged as vital in risk stratification. Clinicians and patients should engage in shared decision-making to evaluate the appropriateness of active ICD therapy for any given individual. In this article, we explore the definition of HFrecEF, data underlying continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients who have achieved left ventricular ejection fraction recovery, the benefits and risks of active ICD therapy, and surrogate measures that may have a role in risk stratification.

摘要

鉴于在改善慢性收缩性心力衰竭相关结局的药物和非药物策略方面的最新进展,射血分数恢复的心力衰竭(HFrecEF)现在被认为是一种独特的临床实体,其患病率正在增加。在许多曾经有活性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗指征的患者中,对于在心肌恢复后,这种预防晕厥和心脏骤停的一级预防策略是否有用,仍存在疑问。早期的小型研究为 HFrecEF 人群中继续进行指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)提供了令人信服的证据,以促进持续性左心室心肌恢复。回顾性数据表明,HFrecEF 中心脏性猝死的风险较低,但仍存在,与射血分数降低的心力衰竭相比,每 100 名患者年报告多达 5 次适当的 ICD 治疗。继续 ICD 治疗的益处与该策略的不利影响相权衡,包括感染、不适当放电和患者层面的焦虑的累积风险。从历史上看,已经探索了许多风险分层的替代指标,但很少有指标证明其疗效和广泛可用性。我们发现,关于在该人群中继续使用主动 ICD 治疗的决策的可用数据不完整,并且出现了更多先进的工具,如基因检测、高危结构性心肌病(如非致密性心肌病)的评估和心脏磁共振成像,这些工具在风险分层中变得至关重要。临床医生和患者应共同参与决策,评估对任何特定个体进行主动 ICD 治疗的适宜性。在本文中,我们探讨了 HFrecEF 的定义、左心室射血分数恢复患者继续接受指南指导的药物治疗的基础数据、主动 ICD 治疗的益处和风险,以及可能在风险分层中发挥作用的替代指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验