Department of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2055-2061. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.044. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using two different oversized rasps in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a composite beam cemented stem (DCM-J).
A consecutive series of 105 hips underwent hybrid THA using the DCM-J stem between 2006 and 2010. Among the patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up, a 1.5-mm oversized rasp was used in 38 hips (group S), whereas a 0.5-mm oversized rasp was used in 36 hips (group M). The Japanese Orthopedic Association hip score and radiographic findings were evaluated, including cement mantle thickness, stress shielding, and cortical hypertrophy.
The Japanese Orthopedic Association hip score was significantly improved postoperatively with 100% of the implant survival rate in both groups when septic loosening was excluded. Radiographic assessment performed immediately postoperatively revealed that the cement mantle thickness was significantly larger in group M than group S in Gruen zone 1 but did not differ between groups in zones 2-7. Stress shielding was significantly more frequent in group M than group S at 2 years (P = .011), 5 years (P = .012), and ≥10 years postoperatively (P = .038). Cortical hypertrophy appeared in a time-dependent manner; however, the prevalence did not significantly differ between groups at final follow-up at a mean of 11.7 years (range 10-14 years) postoperatively.
The DCM-J stem achieved good clinical results in both groups. Stress shielding was significantly more frequent in THA using the 0.5-mm rasp than the 1.5-mm rasp, indicating that sufficient cement mantle room should be prepared for the cemented stem.
本研究旨在比较在使用复合梁骨水泥固定柄(DCM-J)的全髋关节置换术(THA)中使用两种不同尺寸扩孔锉的临床和影像学结果。
2006 年至 2010 年,连续系列的 105 髋接受了 DCM-J 柄的混合 THA。在具有至少 10 年随访的患者中,38 髋(S 组)使用 1.5mm 尺寸扩孔锉,36 髋(M 组)使用 0.5mm 尺寸扩孔锉。评估日本矫形协会髋关节评分和影像学发现,包括骨水泥覆盖层厚度、应力遮挡和皮质肥大。
排除感染性松动后,两组的日本矫形协会髋关节评分均显著改善,且 100%的植入物存活率。术后即刻影像学评估显示,M 组在 Gruen 区域 1 的骨水泥覆盖层厚度明显大于 S 组,但在区域 2-7 之间无差异。M 组在 2 年(P=0.011)、5 年(P=0.012)和术后≥10 年(P=0.038)时,应力遮挡明显比 S 组更频繁。皮质肥大呈时间依赖性出现,但在最终随访时,两组之间的患病率无显著差异,平均随访时间为 11.7 年(10-14 年)。
DCM-J 柄在两组中均获得了良好的临床结果。在使用 0.5mm 扩孔锉的 THA 中,应力遮挡明显比使用 1.5mm 扩孔锉更频繁,这表明应为主固位柄准备足够的骨水泥覆盖层空间。