Youssef Nagy A, Phung Phung, Patel Rikinkumar S
Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 997 St. Sebastian Way, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Griffin Memorial Hospital, 900 E Main St, Norman, OK, 73071, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Oklahoma State University, 1111 W 17th St, Tulsa, OK, 74107, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:384-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.032. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is cleared for treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) but is an investigational treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics of patients who received DBS as part of standard care for OCD versus those who received it a part of a research protocol for MDD.
The inpatient sample (N = 110) was drawn from the 2012-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), and included adults with a primary discharge diagnosis of MDD (N = 50) or OCD (N = 60) and primary procedure of DBS. The study compared various patient demographics, clinical, hospital and insurance variables between the 2 groups.
DBS recipients with OCD were younger compared to those with MDD. DBS recipients with MDD tended to be from high-income families compared to those with OCD. DBS patients with MDD were in the South region, while DBS patients with OCD were in the Midwest and South regions of the United States (US). The study did not detect a significant difference in the length of stay and total charges among DBS recipients with OCD versus MDD.
DBS patients with MDD are typically older with more financial resources compared to those with OCD. DBS is federally cleared for OCD, but not for MDD, demonstrating the need for further investigation to establish DBS as a federally cleared treatment for difficult to treat MDD if well-powered randomized trials further support its use.
脑深部电刺激术(DBS)已被批准用于治疗强迫症(OCD),但用于治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)仍处于研究阶段。本研究的目的是比较作为强迫症标准治疗一部分接受DBS治疗的患者与作为重度抑郁症研究方案一部分接受DBS治疗的患者的特征。
住院患者样本(N = 110)取自2012 - 2014年全国住院患者样本(NIS),包括主要出院诊断为重度抑郁症(N = 50)或强迫症(N = 60)且主要手术为DBS的成年人。该研究比较了两组患者的各种人口统计学、临床、医院和保险变量。
与重度抑郁症患者相比,接受DBS治疗的强迫症患者更年轻。与强迫症患者相比,接受DBS治疗的重度抑郁症患者往往来自高收入家庭。接受DBS治疗的重度抑郁症患者在美国南部地区,而接受DBS治疗的强迫症患者在美国中西部和南部地区。该研究未发现接受DBS治疗的强迫症患者与重度抑郁症患者在住院时间和总费用方面存在显著差异。
与强迫症患者相比,接受DBS治疗的重度抑郁症患者通常年龄更大且经济资源更多。DBS已获得联邦政府批准用于治疗强迫症,但未获批用于治疗重度抑郁症,这表明如果有足够样本量的随机试验进一步支持其使用,就需要进一步研究以将DBS确立为联邦政府批准的难治性重度抑郁症治疗方法。