• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然探访的驱动因素是否存在空间差异?理解欧洲和北美的自然区域探访情况的重要性在于背景。

Do drivers of nature visitation vary spatially? The importance of context for understanding visitation of nature areas in Europe and North America.

机构信息

Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 1;776:145190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145190. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145190
PMID:33639459
Abstract

Nature visitation is important, both culturally and economically. Given the contribution of nature recreation to multiple societal goals, comprehending determinants of nature visitation is essential to understand the drivers associated with the popularity of nature areas, for example, to inform land-use planning or site management strategies to maximise benefits. Understanding the factors related to nature, tourism and recreation can support the management of nature areas and thereby, also conservation efforts and biodiversity protection. This study applied a Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) to quantify the spatially varying influence of different factors associated with nature visitation in Europe and North America. Results indicated that some explanatory variables were stationary for all sites (age 15 to 65, population density (within 25 km), GDP, area, built-up areas, plateaus, and mountains). In contrast, others exhibited significant spatial non-stationarity (locally variable): needle-leaf trees (conifers), trails, travel time, roads, and Red List birds and amphibians. Needle-leaf trees and travel time were found to be negatively significant in Europe. Roads were found to have a significant positive effect in North America. Trails and Red List bird species were found to have a positive effect in both North America and North Europe, with a greater effect in Europe. Red List amphibians was the only spatially variable predictor to have both a positive and negative impact, with selected sites in North America and northern Europe being positive, whereas Iceland and central and southern Europe were negative. The scale of the response-predictor relationship (bandwidth) of these locally variable predictors was smallest for Red List amphibians at 1033 km, with all other spatially variable predictors between 9558 and 12,285 km. The study demonstrates the contribution that MGWR, a spatially explicit model, can make to support a deeper understanding of processes associated with nature visitation in different geographic contexts.

摘要

自然体验具有重要的文化和经济意义。鉴于自然游憩对多个社会目标的贡献,理解自然体验的决定因素对于理解与自然区受欢迎程度相关的驱动因素至关重要,例如,为土地利用规划或场地管理策略提供信息,以最大限度地发挥效益。了解与自然、旅游和休闲相关的因素可以支持自然区的管理,从而也支持保护努力和生物多样性保护。本研究应用多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)来量化与欧洲和北美的自然体验相关的不同因素的空间变化影响。结果表明,一些解释变量对所有地点都是固定的(15 至 65 岁,人口密度(25 公里以内),国内生产总值,面积,建成区,高原和山脉)。相比之下,其他变量表现出显著的空间非平稳性(局部变化):针叶树(针叶树)、小径、旅行时间、道路以及红名单鸟类和两栖动物。在欧洲,发现针叶树和旅行时间具有负显著影响。在北美洲,发现道路具有显著的正效应。在北美洲和北欧发现小径和红名单鸟类都有积极的影响,而在欧洲的影响更大。红名单两栖动物是唯一具有正负面影响的空间变量预测因子,在北美洲和北欧的一些选定地点为正,而冰岛和欧洲中部和南部为负。这些局部变量预测因子的响应-预测因子关系(带宽)的尺度在红名单两栖动物处最小,为 1033 公里,所有其他空间变量预测因子的尺度在 9558 到 12285 公里之间。该研究表明,MGWR(一种空间显式模型)可以为在不同地理背景下支持对与自然体验相关的过程的更深入理解做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Do drivers of nature visitation vary spatially? The importance of context for understanding visitation of nature areas in Europe and North America.自然探访的驱动因素是否存在空间差异?理解欧洲和北美的自然区域探访情况的重要性在于背景。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 1;776:145190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145190. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Recreational Use of the Countryside: No Evidence that High Nature Value Enhances a Key Ecosystem Service.乡村的休闲利用:没有证据表明高自然价值能提升关键生态系统服务。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165043. eCollection 2016.
3
Recreational trails reduce the density of ground-dwelling birds in protected areas.休闲步道会降低保护区内地面栖息鸟类的密度。
Environ Manage. 2015 May;55(5):1181-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0458-4. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism.基于自然的旅游趋势的全球视角。
PLoS Biol. 2009 Jun 30;7(6):e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000144.
5
The impact of nature-based tourism on bird communities: a case study in Pallas-Yllästunturi National Park.基于自然的旅游对鸟类群落的影响:以帕拉斯-耶拉斯图里国家公园为例
Environ Manage. 2014 May;53(5):1005-14. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0253-7. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
6
Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere.南半球最高保护区内非正式步道对植被和土壤的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Impacts of recreation and tourism on plant biodiversity and vegetation in protected areas in Australia.娱乐和旅游业对澳大利亚保护区内植物生物多样性和植被的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Dec;85(4):791-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.021. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
8
Assessing global popularity and threats to Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas using social media data.利用社交媒体数据评估重点鸟类和生物多样性区域的全球知名度和面临的威胁。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 15;683:617-623. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.268. Epub 2019 May 19.
9
Tourism, biodiversity and protected areas--Review from northern Fennoscandia.旅游业、生物多样性与保护区——来自芬兰北部斯堪的纳维亚地区的综述
J Environ Manage. 2016 Mar 15;169:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
10
Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas.涉足荒野:估算全球保护区游客量规模
PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074. eCollection 2015 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
A dataset of pre-pandemic African protected area visitation.疫情前非洲保护区游客量数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 May 8;12(1):764. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04998-7.