• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立体定向放射外科治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘后血管构筑的变化。

Changes in Angioarchitecture After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105676. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105676. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105676
PMID:33640784
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dural arteriovenous fistulae (DAVF) are intracranial vascular abnormalities encountered in neurosurgery practice. Treatment options are microsurgical disconnection, endovascular embolization and/or radiosurgery. Past studies have reported the efficacy, safety, and predictors of success of radiosurgery. In this study, we investigated the angioarchitecture of fistulae at the time of radiosurgery and how the anatomy changed in the time after treatment based on angiogram follow-ups.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with angiographic diagnosis of DAVF treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2013 and 2018. Data collection included demographics, symptoms, grading scores, vascular anatomy, radiation data, treatment strategy, angiographic results, and length of patient follow-up.

RESULTS

Our study reports data on 10 patients with a total of 14 fistulae. On follow-up angiography, 8 (57%) had complete occlusion of the fistula with a median time to follow up of 19.5 months. The remaining 6 (43%) were deemed as near-complete occlusion of fistula with a median time to follow up of 12.0 months. Time from radiosurgery to angiogram revealing incomplete vs. angiogram revealing complete obliteration was significantly different (p=0.045). Nearly all AVFs had decreased feeders over time after treatment with only one AVF developing an additional feeder post-treatment. Arterial feeders, drainage site, sex, Borden type, lesion volume and treatment volume had no predictive value of obliteration outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides data on the angioarchitecture of fistulae treated with GKRS and also serves as an extension of previous studies reporting the safety and efficacy of GKRS treatment for DAVF in a specific patient population.

摘要

简介

硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)是神经外科实践中遇到的颅内血管异常。治疗选择包括显微手术切断、血管内栓塞和/或放射外科治疗。过去的研究报告了放射外科治疗的疗效、安全性和成功预测因素。在这项研究中,我们调查了放射外科时瘘管的血管结构,并根据血管造影随访,研究了治疗后血管结构的变化。

方法

对 2013 年至 2018 年间接受伽玛刀放射外科(GKRS)治疗的 DAVF 患者进行回顾性分析。数据收集包括人口统计学、症状、分级评分、血管解剖、放射数据、治疗策略、血管造影结果和患者随访时间。

结果

我们的研究报告了 10 例患者共 14 个瘘管的数据。在随访血管造影中,8 例(57%)瘘管完全闭塞,中位随访时间为 19.5 个月。其余 6 例(43%)被认为是瘘管接近完全闭塞,中位随访时间为 12.0 个月。从放射外科到血管造影显示不完全闭塞与显示完全闭塞的时间明显不同(p=0.045)。几乎所有的动静脉瘘在治疗后随着时间的推移,其供血动脉都会减少,只有一例动静脉瘘在治疗后出现了新的供血动脉。动脉供血动脉、引流部位、性别、Borden 类型、病变体积和治疗体积对闭塞结果均无预测价值。

结论

本研究提供了 GKRS 治疗瘘管的血管结构数据,也是对以前研究的扩展,这些研究报告了 GKRS 治疗特定患者人群的 DAVF 的安全性和疗效。

相似文献

1
Changes in Angioarchitecture After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.立体定向放射外科治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘后血管构筑的变化。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105676. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105676. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
A Retrospective Analysis of the Outcomes of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A Single-Institution Experience.伽玛刀放射外科治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘的疗效回顾性分析:单机构经验
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(1):46-53. doi: 10.1159/000486685. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.伽玛刀放射外科治疗颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘
Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Apr;23(2):211-220. doi: 10.1177/1591019916683689. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas in a multicenter international consortium.多中心国际联盟评估立体定向放射外科治疗脑硬脑膜动静脉瘘。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 1;132(1):114-121. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181467. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: its clinical and angiographic perspectives.颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘的立体定向放射外科治疗:临床与血管造影视角
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jun;159(6):1093-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3177-1. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Safety evaluation of sinus patency after stereotactic radiosurgery for transverse-sigmoid sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas: implications of treatment options for patients with Borden type I fistulas.横窦-乙状窦区硬脑膜动静脉瘘立体定向放射外科治疗后面窦通畅性的安全性评估:Borden Ⅰ型瘘患者治疗选择的影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Mar;56(3):E12. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.FOCUS23802.
7
Gamma Knife surgery for clival epidural-osseous dural arteriovenous fistulas.伽玛刀手术治疗斜坡硬膜外-骨硬脑膜动静脉瘘。
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1364-1371. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS161346. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
8
Sinovenous outflow in lateral sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas after stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective longitudinal imaging study.立体定向放射手术后外侧窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘的窦静脉流出:一项回顾性纵向影像学研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Sep;164(9):2409-2418. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05310-x. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
Multimodal treatment strategies for complex pediatric cerebral arteriovenous fistulas: contemporary case series at Barrow Neurological Institute.复杂小儿脑动静脉瘘的多模式治疗策略:巴罗神经学研究所的当代病例系列
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jun;15(6):615-24. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14468. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery versus endovascular treatment for symptomatic cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula without ophthalmological emergency: a single-center 10-year experience.立体定向放射外科与血管内治疗对无眼科急症的症状性海绵窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘的疗效和安全性:单中心 10 年经验。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Dec 2;139(1):139-149. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221770. Print 2023 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereotactic radiosurgery for noncavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas: treatment outcomes and their predictors.立体定向放射外科治疗非海绵窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘:治疗结果及其预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 24;140(5):1389-1398. doi: 10.3171/2023.9.JNS231474. Print 2024 May 1.