Van de Winckel Ann, Nawshin Tanjila, Byron Casey
Division of Physical Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 18;5(3):e22659. doi: 10.2196/22659.
Patients with chronic diseases often need to adhere to long-term individualized home exercise programs (HEPs). Limited adherence to long-term exercise given during physical therapy (PT) visits reduces the capacity of exercise to manage or improve symptoms related to chronic disease. In addition, a lower socioeconomic status negatively impacts exercise adherence. To mitigate this, apps that motivate people to exercise could be a viable option. Using an app through telehealth may help adults with chronic diseases to achieve long-term HEP adherence. However, because apps for rehabilitation are an emerging field, the feasibility of the app needs to be evaluated.
To address HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of and satisfaction with the Hudl Technique app and telehealth and satisfaction with PT care and to monitor HEP adherence and compliance (ie, percentage of participant-recorded videos sent) in participants using the app with telehealth compared with those using standard HEPs on paper.
We recruited patients scheduled for outpatient PT. We performed a randomized controlled trial in which the experimental group received weekly HEP demonstrations through app videos on a tablet with feedback on their self-recorded HEP video performance from the telehealth physical therapist. The control group received HEPs on paper without feedback, as is customary in PT practice. Demographic, clinical, and health coverage information was collected for screening and baseline measurements. Adherence and compliance were evaluated. Both groups completed surveys at 8 and 24 weeks on their satisfaction with PT care, and the experimental group also completed a survey on their satisfaction with the app with telehealth use. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used for within-group and between-group comparisons and analyzed with JMP, version 13.
Overall, 45 adults with chronic diseases who were experiencing financial distress were randomized into experimental (23/45, 51%) and control (22/45, 49%) groups, with 74% (17/23) and 86% (19/22) participants completing the 24-week HEP, respectively. The experimental group had an HEP adherence frequency of 4 (SD 2) to 5 (SD 2) times per week at 8 and 24 weeks (P=.14), whereas HEP adherence decreased in the control group from 4 (SD 2) to 3 (SD 2) times per week (P=.07), with a significant difference (P=.01) between groups at 24 weeks. Of the total participants, 68% (15/22) sent videos. They sent 68% (16/24) of the requested number of videos on average. The average score for PT care satisfaction was maintained at 87% in the experimental group (P=.99), whereas it decreased from 89% at 8 weeks to 74% at 24 weeks (P=.008) in the control group. App-related adverse events were not observed.
The Hudl app/telehealth platform is feasible for delivering HEPs and maintaining HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659280; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02659280.
慢性病患者通常需要坚持长期的个性化家庭锻炼计划(HEP)。在物理治疗(PT)就诊期间,对长期锻炼的依从性有限会降低锻炼对控制或改善慢性病相关症状的能力。此外,较低的社会经济地位对锻炼依从性有负面影响。为缓解这一问题,激励人们锻炼的应用程序可能是一个可行的选择。通过远程医疗使用应用程序可能有助于患有慢性病的成年人长期坚持HEP。然而,由于康复应用程序是一个新兴领域,该应用程序的可行性需要评估。
为了解决经济困难的慢性病参与者的HEP依从性问题,我们旨在评估Hudl Technique应用程序和远程医疗的可行性及满意度、对PT护理的满意度,并监测使用该应用程序和远程医疗的参与者与使用纸质标准HEP的参与者相比的HEP依从性和合规性(即参与者发送的视频记录百分比)。
我们招募了安排进行门诊PT的患者。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,其中实验组通过平板电脑上的应用程序视频每周接受HEP示范,并从远程医疗物理治疗师那里获得关于他们自我记录的HEP视频表现的反馈。对照组按照PT实践的惯例,在纸上接收HEP且无反馈。收集人口统计学、临床和健康保险信息用于筛查和基线测量。评估依从性和合规性。两组在第8周和第24周完成关于他们对PT护理满意度的调查,实验组还完成了关于他们对使用远程医疗的应用程序满意度的调查。使用描述性和非参数统计进行组内和组间比较,并使用JMP 13版进行分析。
总体而言,45名经济困难的慢性病成年人被随机分为实验组(23/45,51%)和对照组(22/45,49%),分别有74%(17/23)和86%(19/22)的参与者完成了24周的HEP。实验组在第8周和第24周的HEP依从频率为每周4(标准差2)至5(标准差2)次(P = 0.14),而对照组的HEP依从性从每周4(标准差2)次降至3(标准差2)次(P = 0.07),两组在第24周时有显著差异(P = 0.01)。在所有参与者中,68%(15/22)发送了视频。他们平均发送了要求视频数量的68%(16/24)。实验组对PT护理满意度的平均得分保持在87%(P = 0.99),而对照组从第8周的89%降至第24周的74%(P = 0.008)。未观察到与应用程序相关的不良事件。
Hudl应用程序/远程医疗平台对于为经济困难的慢性病参与者提供HEP并维持HEP依从性是可行的。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659280;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02659280