• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention in Spain.西班牙多学科专家共识:预防二次骨折
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Feb 27;16(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00878-w.
2
Spanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosis.西班牙骨质疏松治疗目标的共识。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Feb;29(2):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4310-y. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.德尔福共识:西班牙高骨折风险骨质疏松症患者的管理:OSARIDELPHI 研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Aug 23;18(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01318-7.
4
Cancer-Related Pain Management in Suitable Intrathecal Therapy Candidates: A Spanish Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus.适合鞘内治疗的癌症相关性疼痛管理:西班牙多学科专家共识。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):7303-7314. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080530.
5
Expert Consensus on the Management of Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in the Spanish Healthcare System.西班牙医疗体系中绝经后骨质疏松症患者管理的专家共识
Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):658-69. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0314-9. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
A Delphi consensus on the management of oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain: ACOPREFERENCE study.西班牙非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗管理的德尔福共识:ACOPREFERENCE 研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0231565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231565. eCollection 2020.
7
Real-life clinical practice in Spain in the setting of new drug availability for ITP treatment. A Delphi-based Spanish expert panel consensus.西班牙新的 ITP 治疗药物上市背景下的真实临床实践。基于德尔菲法的西班牙专家小组共识。
Platelets. 2024 Dec;35(1):2336104. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2024.2336104. Epub 2024 May 14.
8
Adult essential extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) skills for use in an e-learning program for ICU physicians, nurses and perfusionists: a consensus by a modified Delphi questionnaire.成人基础体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)技能,用于 ICU 医师、护士和灌注师的电子学习计划:通过修改后的 Delphi 问卷调查达成的共识。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03764-2.
9
Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project.采用德尔菲共识法为新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者定义一套标准化结局指标:IMPORTA项目
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850.
10
A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline.一项德尔菲调查,以确定循证实践教育干预措施应如何报告:报告指南制定的第二阶段。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 31;14:159. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-159.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care follow-up of patients after attending a fracture liaison service: an integrative review.骨折联络服务后患者的初级保健随访:一项综合综述。
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 May 13;20(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01521-8.
2
Cancer-Related Pain Management in Suitable Intrathecal Therapy Candidates: A Spanish Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus.适合鞘内治疗的癌症相关性疼痛管理:西班牙多学科专家共识。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):7303-7314. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080530.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and managing osteoporosis before and after COVID-19: rise of the remote consultation?在 COVID-19 前后识别和管理骨质疏松症:远程咨询的兴起?
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep;31(9):1629-1632. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05465-2. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
2
Usefulness of a national hip fracture registry to evaluate the profile of patients in whom antiosteoporotic treatment is prescribed following hospital discharge.利用国家髋部骨折登记处评估在出院后接受抗骨质疏松治疗的患者的特征。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1369-1375. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05341-z. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Nutritional Support and Physical Modalities for People with Osteoporosis: Current Opinion.骨质疏松症患者的营养支持和物理治疗方法:现状与展望。
Nutrients. 2019 Nov 20;11(12):2848. doi: 10.3390/nu11122848.
4
[Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): First-year results and comparison with other registries and prospective multi-centric studies from Spain].[西班牙国家髋部骨折注册中心(RNFC):第一年结果以及与西班牙其他注册中心和前瞻性多中心研究的比较]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Oct 18;93:e201910072.
5
Fragility fractures - Global call to action.脆性骨折——全球行动呼吁。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;33(2):203-204. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101430. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition.二级骨折预防:多利益相关者联盟的共识临床建议。
J Bone Miner Res. 2020 Jan;35(1):36-52. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3877. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
7
The impact of hip fracture on health-related quality of life and activities of daily living: the SPARE-HIP prospective cohort study.髋部骨折对健康相关生活质量和日常生活活动的影响:SPARE-HIP 前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 May 29;14(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0607-0.
8
Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries.西班牙国家髋关节骨折登记处(RNFC):对其首份年度报告的分析及与其他已建立的登记处的国际比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jun;30(6):1243-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04939-2. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
9
A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures.改善脆性骨折患者护理的全球行动呼吁。
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
10
Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.骨折联络服务可改善骨质疏松性骨折患者的结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

西班牙多学科专家共识:预防二次骨折

Multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention in Spain.

机构信息

Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí (UAB), Sabadell, Spain.

Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Feb 27;16(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00878-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-021-00878-w
PMID:33641008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7914041/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The study aimed to achieve expert consensus to optimize secondary fracture prevention in Spain. Relevant gaps in current patient management were identified. However, some aspects were considered difficult to apply. Future efforts should focus on those items with greatest divergences between importance and feasibility.

PURPOSE

To establish a Spanish multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi consensus was conducted, guided by a Scientific Committee. The 43-item study questionnaire was designed from a literature review and a subsequent multidisciplinary expert group (n = 12) discussion. The first-round questionnaire, using a 7-point Likert scale, assessed the experts' opinion of the current situation, their wish for items to happen, and their prognosis that items would be implemented within 5 years. Items for which consensus was not achieved were included in the second round. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement or ≥ 75% disagreement. A total of 102 experts from 14 scientific societies were invited to participate.

RESULTS

A total of 75 (response rate 73.5%) and 69 (92.0%) experts answered the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Participants mean age was 51.8 years [standard deviation (SD): 10.1 years]; being 24.0% rheumatologists, 21.3% primary care physicians, 14.7% geriatricians, 8.0% internal medicine specialists, 8.0% rehabilitation physicians, and 8.0% gynecologists. Consensus was achieved for 79.1% of items (wish, 100%; prognosis, 58.1%). Effective secondary prevention strategies identified as requiring improvement included: clinical report standardization, effective hospital primary care communication (telephone/mail and case managers), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires use, and treatment compliance monitoring (prognosis agreement 33.3%, 47.8%, 18.8%, and 55.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A consensus was reached by health professionals in their wish to implement strategies to optimize secondary fracture prevention; however, they considered some difficult to apply. Efforts should focus on those items with currently low application and those with greatest divergence between wish and prognosis.

摘要

目的

建立西班牙多学科专家共识,以预防继发性骨折。

方法

采用两轮德尔菲法共识,由科学委员会指导。43 项研究问卷由文献回顾和随后的多学科专家小组(n=12)讨论设计。第一轮问卷采用 7 分李克特量表,评估专家对现状的看法、他们希望发生的项目以及他们对项目在 5 年内实施的预测。未达成共识的项目纳入第二轮。共识定义为≥75%的同意或≥75%的不同意。共邀请来自 14 个科学协会的 102 名专家参与。

结果

共有 75 名(应答率 73.5%)和 69 名(92.0%)专家分别回答了第一和第二轮德尔菲调查。参与者的平均年龄为 51.8 岁[标准差(SD):10.1 岁];24.0%为风湿病专家,21.3%为初级保健医生,14.7%为老年病专家,8.0%为内科专家,8.0%为康复医生,8.0%为妇科医生。79.1%的项目达成共识(愿望,100%;预测,58.1%)。需要改进的有效二级预防策略包括:临床报告标准化、有效医院初级保健沟通(电话/邮件和个案经理)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)问卷使用和治疗依从性监测(预测协议分别为 33.3%、47.8%、18.8%和 55.1%)。

结论

卫生专业人员达成共识,希望实施优化继发性骨折预防的策略;然而,他们认为有些难以实施。应重点关注目前应用率较低且愿望与预测差异较大的项目。