Kudo Shin-Ei, Maeda Yasuharu, Ogata Noriyuki, Misawa Masashi, Ogawa Yushi, Takishima Kazumi, Ishiyama Misaki, Mochizuki Kenichi, Minegishi Yosuke, Ogura Yohei, Abe Masahiro, Okumura Taishi, Matsudaira Shingo, Ishigaki Tomoyuki, Sasanuma Seiko, Mori Yuichi, Kudo Toyoki, Hayashi Takemasa, Wakamura Kunihiko, Miyachi Hideyuki, Baba Toshiyuki, Ishida Fumio, Nemoto Tetsuo, Hamatani Shigeharu, Ohtsuka Kazuo
Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):133-143. doi: 10.1111/den.13964. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasias (UCAN) are often flat with an indistinct boundary from surrounding tissues, which makes differentiating UCAN from non-neoplasias difficult. Pit pattern (PIT) has been reported as one of the most effective indicators to identify UCAN. However, regenerated mucosa is also often diagnosed as a neoplastic PIT. Endocytoscopy (EC) allows visualization of cell nuclei. The aim of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the diagnostic ability of combined EC irregularly-formed nuclei with PIT (EC-IN-PIT) diagnosis to identify UCAN.
This study involved patients with ulcerative colitis whose lesions were observed by EC. Each lesion was diagnosed by two independent expert endoscopists, using two types of diagnostic strategies: PIT alone and EC-IN-PIT. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic abilities of PIT alone and EC-IN-PIT. We also examined the difference in the diagnostic abilities of an EC-IN-PIT diagnosis according to endoscopic inflammation severity.
We analyzed 103 lesions from 62 patients; 23 lesions were UCAN and 80 were non-neoplastic. EC-IN-PIT diagnosis had a significantly higher specificity and accuracy compared with PIT alone: 84% versus 58% (P < 0.001), and 88% versus 67% (P < 0.01), respectively. The specificity and accuracy were significantly higher for Mayo endoscopic score (MES) 0-1 than MES 2-3: 93% versus 68% (P < 0.001) and 95% versus 74% (P < 0.001), respectively.
Our novel EC-IN-PIT strategy had a better diagnostic ability than PIT alone to predict UCAN from suspected and initially detected lesions using conventional colonoscopy. UMIN clinical trial (UMIN000040698).
溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤(UCAN)通常呈扁平状,与周围组织边界不清,这使得区分UCAN与非肿瘤性病变变得困难。据报道,凹坑模式(PIT)是识别UCAN最有效的指标之一。然而,再生黏膜也常被诊断为肿瘤性PIT。内镜下细胞内镜检查(EC)可观察细胞核。本回顾性研究的目的是证明联合EC不规则形细胞核与PIT(EC-IN-PIT)诊断识别UCAN的诊断能力。
本研究纳入了经EC观察病变的溃疡性结肠炎患者。由两名独立的专家内镜医师采用两种诊断策略对每个病变进行诊断:单独使用PIT和EC-IN-PIT。我们评估并比较了单独使用PIT和EC-IN-PIT的诊断能力。我们还根据内镜炎症严重程度检查了EC-IN-PIT诊断的诊断能力差异。
我们分析了62例患者的103个病变;23个病变为UCAN,80个为非肿瘤性病变。与单独使用PIT相比,EC-IN-PIT诊断的特异性和准确性显著更高:分别为84%对58%(P<0.001)和88%对67%(P<0.01)。Mayo内镜评分(MES)0-1时的特异性和准确性显著高于MES 2-3时:分别为93%对68%(P<0.001)和95%对74%(P<0.001)。
我们新的EC-IN-PIT策略在使用传统结肠镜检查从疑似和最初检测到的病变中预测UCAN方面比单独使用PIT具有更好的诊断能力。UMIN临床试验(UMIN000040698)。