Institute for Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Never Again Consulting, Attleboro, MA, USA.
New Solut. 2021 Aug;31(2):152-169. doi: 10.1177/1048291121996645. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
The talc industry and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have asserted that talc has been asbestos-free since 1976 when the industry created a voluntary specification for the asbestos content of cosmetic talc. However, recent evidence reveals that cosmetic talc is not and never was asbestos-free. This narrative review examines the talc industry's role in delaying and ultimately blocking federal regulation of cosmetic talc from the 1970s to today. We review primary source material, including corporate documents released in recent litigation and FDA documents released in response to Freedom of Information Act requests. Our results indicate that the talc industry exerted considerable influence over three key areas: regulatory proceedings at the FDA; testing methods and the manipulation of test results (including undisclosed results); and press coverage and the medical literature. The talc companies' actions and FDA indifference have had a lasting effect on consumer health, including the regulation of talc by other government agencies.
滑石行业和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)声称,自 1976 年滑石行业制定了化妆品用滑石粉中石棉含量的自愿标准以来,滑石粉就不含石棉了。然而,最近的证据表明,化妆品用滑石粉并非一直也从未不含石棉。本叙述性综述考察了滑石行业在从 20 世纪 70 年代至今阻碍和最终阻止联邦政府对化妆品用滑石粉进行监管的作用。我们审查了原始资料,包括在最近的诉讼中公布的公司文件和 FDA 为回应信息自由法案要求而公布的文件。我们的研究结果表明,滑石行业对以下三个关键领域施加了相当大的影响:FDA 的监管程序;测试方法和测试结果的操纵(包括未公开的结果);以及新闻报道和医学文献。滑石公司的行为和 FDA 的漠不关心对消费者健康产生了持久的影响,包括其他政府机构对滑石粉的监管。