Union of Concerned Scientists, 1825 K Street NW, Ste 800, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity Initiative, Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Dec;42(4):622-634. doi: 10.1057/s41271-021-00318-6. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
For decades, corporate undermining of scientific consensus has eroded the scientific process worldwide. Guardrails for protecting science-informed processes, from peer review to regulatory decision making, have suffered sustained attacks, damaging public trust in the scientific enterprise and its aim to serve the public good. Government efforts to address corporate attacks have been inadequate. Researchers have cataloged corporate malfeasance that harms people's health across diverse industries. Well-known cases, like the tobacco industry's efforts to downplay the dangers of smoking, are representative of transnational industries, rather than unique. This contribution schematizes industry tactics to distort, delay, or distract the public from instituting measures that improve health-tactics that comprise the "disinformation playbook." Using a United States policy lens, we outline steps the scientific community should take to shield science from corporate interference, through individual actions (by scientists, peer reviewers, and editors) and collective initiatives (by research institutions, grant organizations, professional associations, and regulatory agencies).
几十年来,企业对科学共识的破坏已经削弱了全球的科学进程。从同行评审到监管决策,保护以科学为依据的过程的护栏一直受到持续攻击,损害了公众对科学事业及其为公众利益服务的目标的信任。政府解决企业攻击的努力是不够的。研究人员已经对各种行业中损害人们健康的企业不当行为进行了分类。像烟草行业努力淡化吸烟危害这样的知名案例,代表了跨国行业,而不是独一无二的。本贡献对行业策略进行了分类,这些策略旨在歪曲、拖延或分散公众对采取改善健康措施的注意力——这些策略构成了“虚假信息剧本”。我们使用美国政策视角,概述了科学界应该采取的步骤,通过个人行动(科学家、同行评审员和编辑)和集体举措(研究机构、资助组织、专业协会和监管机构)来保护科学免受企业干扰。