Park Sejun, Duthinh Dat, Simiu Emil, Yeo DongHun
NIST Director's Postdoctoral Research Associate, Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Research Engineer, Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
J Struct Eng (N Y N Y). 2019;145(5). doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002328.
This paper illustrates the application of the database-assisted design (DAD) method to the wind design of high-rise buildings. The paper uses publicly available wind tunnel data and DAD procedures to compare responses to (1) corner winds and (2) face winds of a high-rise building of square cross-section supported by a central core column and four mid-side legs. The responses being considered consist of overturning moments, and of demand-to-capacity indexes (DCIs) of selected members, including multistory chevron braces. The analysis accounts for structural dynamics and second-order load-deformation effects. The results show that corner winds are less demanding than face winds, both globally (overturning moments) and locally (DCIs). The along-wind and across-wind overturning moments in the corner wind case are about 20% and 50% lower, respectively, than their counterparts in the face-wind case. The peak axial forces in the legs (peak refers to absolute value) and the peak DCIs in the mid-side mast columns (continuation of the legs) induced by corner winds are lower by 20%-30% than their counterparts due to face winds. The investigation confirms that the building code of the City of New York in effect in the early 1970s can be interpreted as meaning that the design for wind of structures with a square shape in plan may be performed by assuming the wind loads to act normal to a face of the building. The building analyzed in this paper is similar to the Citicorp Building (completed in 1977, later renamed Citigroup Center, now called 601 Lexington) and the results of the analyses presented herein suggest that a re-examination of the history of the Citicorp Building design and retrofit may be warranted.
本文阐述了数据库辅助设计(DAD)方法在高层建筑风荷载设计中的应用。本文利用公开可用的风洞数据和DAD程序,比较了由中央核心柱和四个中侧支腿支撑的方形截面高层建筑对(1)角部风荷载和(2)正面风荷载的响应。所考虑的响应包括倾覆力矩以及选定构件(包括多层人字形支撑)的需求-能力指标(DCI)。分析考虑了结构动力学和二阶荷载-变形效应。结果表明,无论是在整体(倾覆力矩)还是局部(DCI)方面,角部风荷载的要求都低于正面风荷载。角部风荷载情况下的顺风向和横风向倾覆力矩分别比正面风荷载情况下的相应值低约20%和50%。角部风荷载引起的支腿峰值轴向力(峰值指绝对值)和中侧桅杆柱(支腿的延续部分)的峰值DCI比正面风荷载引起的相应值低20%-30%。调查证实,20世纪70年代初有效的纽约市建筑规范可以解释为,对于平面形状为方形的结构,其风荷载设计可以通过假定风荷载垂直作用于建筑物的一个面来进行。本文分析的建筑物与花旗集团大楼(1977年建成,后更名为花旗集团中心,现称为列克星敦大道601号)相似,本文给出的分析结果表明,可能有必要重新审视花旗集团大楼的设计和改造历史。