Kramer Hannah J, Wood Taylor D, Lara Karen Hjortsvang, Lagattuta Kristin Hansen
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.
Cogn Dev. 2021 Jan-Mar;57. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100975. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
We examined developmental differences and sources of variability in trait reasoning. Four- to 10-year-olds and adults (=198) rated how mean or nice "medium-mean" and "medium-nice" babies, kids, and teenagers were earlier in their lifetime and would be at older ages. Participants expected nice-labeled characters to be nice throughout their lives (participant age effects were null). In contrast, we documented age-related differences in judgments about meanness. With increasing participant age, individuals expected that meanness present in infancy, childhood, and adolescence would persist into adulthood. We discovered a curvilinear pattern in assessments of whether meanness originates during infancy: Four- to 5-year-olds and adults expected mean-labeled kids and teenagers to have been nicer as babies than did 6- to 10-year-olds. Controlling for age and working memory, participants with better inhibitory control more frequently expected mean-labeled individuals to remain mean across the lifespan, but inhibitory control was unrelated to judgments about nice-labeled individuals.
我们研究了特质推理中的发展差异和变异性来源。4至10岁儿童和成年人(共198人)对“中等刻薄”和“中等友善”的婴儿、儿童及青少年在其生命早期以及年长时的刻薄或友善程度进行了评分。参与者预计被贴上友善标签的角色一生都很友善(参与者年龄效应不显著)。相比之下,我们记录了在对刻薄程度的判断上与年龄相关的差异。随着参与者年龄的增长,个体预计婴儿期、儿童期和青春期出现的刻薄会持续到成年期。我们在对刻薄是否始于婴儿期的评估中发现了一种曲线模式:4至5岁儿童和成年人预计被贴上刻薄标签的儿童和青少年在婴儿期时比6至10岁儿童更友善。在控制年龄和工作记忆的情况下,抑制控制能力较强的参与者更频繁地预计被贴上刻薄标签的个体在整个生命周期中都保持刻薄,但抑制控制与对被贴上友善标签个体的判断无关。