• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性激光小梁成形术应用于360°与180°房角的疗效比较

Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle.

作者信息

Nirappel Abraham, Klug Emma, Ye Rebecca, Hall Nathan, Chachanidze Marika, Chang Ta C, Solá-Del Valle David

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 16;2021:8860601. doi: 10.1155/2021/8860601. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/8860601
PMID:33643665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902141/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of 360° and 180° of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. The main outcome measure was the Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing the cumulative probabilities of survival between the 360° and 180° SLT groups in terms of IOP reduction. Success was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline with an IOP between 5-18 mmHg and ≤1 glaucoma medication added postoperatively. Additional outcome measures included changes in average IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes. Measurements were obtained at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-eight eyes of 258 patients were included in the 360° group, and 196 eyes of 196 patients were included in the 180° group. The mean IOP reductions at 2 years were 2.21 ± 2.02 mmHg and 2.43 ± 1.81 mmHg (=0.33) in the 180° and 360° groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the survival curves of the two groups (=0.035). The Cox proportional-hazard model indicated that 360° of SLT application was a significant predictor of long-term success (=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

360° of SLT application seems to provide for greater long-term IOP control than 180° of application without putting patients at an elevated risk for postoperative IOP spikes.

摘要

目的

比较360°和180°选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)治疗眼压升高的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性队列研究。主要观察指标是采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较360°和180°SLT组眼压降低方面的累积生存概率。成功定义为眼压从基线降低≥20%,眼压在5 - 18 mmHg之间,且术后添加≤1种青光眼药物。其他观察指标包括平均眼压变化、青光眼药物数量以及术后眼压峰值的发生率。在术后6周、1年和2年进行测量。

结果

360°组纳入258例患者的258只眼,180°组纳入196例患者的196只眼。180°组和360°组2年时的平均眼压降低分别为2.21±2.02 mmHg和2.43±1.81 mmHg(P = 0.33)。两组术后眼压峰值的发生率无显著差异。两组的生存曲线有显著差异(P = 0.035)。Cox比例风险模型表明,360°SLT应用是长期成功的显著预测因素(P = 0.030)。

结论

360°SLT应用似乎比180°应用能提供更好的长期眼压控制,且不会使患者术后眼压峰值风险升高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/7902141/aca5977f7e52/joph2021-8860601.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/7902141/f75d3c54a54f/joph2021-8860601.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/7902141/aca5977f7e52/joph2021-8860601.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/7902141/f75d3c54a54f/joph2021-8860601.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/7902141/aca5977f7e52/joph2021-8860601.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle.选择性激光小梁成形术应用于360°与180°房角的疗效比较
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 16;2021:8860601. doi: 10.1155/2021/8860601. eCollection 2021.
2
Real-World Outcomes of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in the United Kingdom.英国选择性激光小梁成形术的真实世界结局。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jun;127(6):748-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty Compared to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty at One Year in Open-Angle Glaucoma.开角型青光眼患者中,微脉冲激光小梁成形术与选择性激光小梁成形术一年期临床疗效比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 22;15:243-251. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S285136. eCollection 2021.
4
Outcomes of pattern scanning laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty: Results from the lausanne laser trabeculoplasty registry.模式扫描激光小梁成形术和选择性激光小梁成形术的结果:来自洛桑激光小梁成形术登记处的结果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;99(2):e154-e159. doi: 10.1111/aos.14534. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus MIGS: Forgotten Art or First-Step Procedure in Selected Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.选择性激光小梁成形术与微侵袭性青光眼手术:在开角型青光眼患者中的被遗忘的技艺还是首选手术?
Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Sep;10(3):509-524. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00347-0. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma.选择性激光小梁成形术与氩激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼的长期疗效比较
Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct;111(10):1853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.030.
7
Comparison of successful outcome predictors for MicroPulse laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty at 6 months.微脉冲激光小梁成形术与选择性激光小梁成形术6个月成功预后预测因素的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 14;13:1001-1009. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S205977. eCollection 2019.
8
Pattern of intraocular pressure reduction following laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma patients: comparison between selective and nonselective treatment.开角型青光眼患者激光小梁成形术后眼压降低模式:选择性与非选择性治疗的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:933-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S21759. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
9
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy: A Case-Control Study.激光周边虹膜切开术后原发性闭角型青光眼的选择性激光小梁成形术:一项病例对照研究。
J Glaucoma. 2016 Mar;25(3):e253-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000282.
10
Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle-closure glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial.选择性激光小梁成形术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;133(2):206-12. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4893.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety and effectiveness of optometrist-delivered selective laser trabeculoplasty.验光师实施选择性激光小梁成形术的安全性和有效性。
Eye (Lond). 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03857-4.
2
Effectiveness of laser therapy among patients with open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.开角型青光眼患者激光治疗的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Oct 22;34(4):12931. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12931.
3
Selective laser trabeculoplasty: An updated narrative review.选择性激光小梁成形术:更新的叙述性综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the effects of 180° and 360° applications of selective laser trabeculoplasty on intraocular pressure and cornea.180°和 360°选择性激光小梁成形术对眼压和角膜影响的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 May;40(5):1103-1110. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01275-6. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Primary Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Clinical Outcomes, Predictors of Success, and Safety from the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial.原发性选择性激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症:青光眼和高眼压症激光试验的临床结果、成功预测因素和安全性。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1238-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 1;72(3):312-319. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2104_23. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Five-year outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty: A retrospective study.选择性激光小梁成形术的五年疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 12;9:1039195. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1039195. eCollection 2022.
5
A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: "The Hype Is Real".选择性激光小梁成形术综述:“炒作属实”
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 4;11(13):3879. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133879.
6
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in the Treatment of Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Clinical Review.选择性激光小梁成形术治疗高眼压症和开角型青光眼:临床综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 27;10(15):3307. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153307.
Evaluation of selective laser trabeculoplasty as an intraocular pressure lowering option.
评价选择性激光小梁成形术作为一种降眼压的选择。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;97(7):707-713. doi: 10.1111/aos.14067. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
A Review of the Clinical Usefulness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Exfoliative Glaucoma.选择性激光小梁成形术在剥脱性青光眼临床应用中的评价。
Adv Ther. 2018 May;35(5):619-630. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0695-z. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Mechanism of Action of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty and Predictors of Response.选择性激光小梁成形术的作用机制及反应预测因素
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1462-1468. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20710.
6
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Primary Treatment for Open-Angle Glaucoma.选择性激光小梁成形术作为开角型青光眼的初始治疗方法
R I Med J (2013). 2016 Jun 1;99(6):22-5.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma.系统评价和荟萃分析选择性激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼的疗效。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):36-50. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Mechanisms of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review.选择性激光小梁成形术的机制:综述
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(7):675-81. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12281. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
9
Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs other treatment modalities for glaucoma: systematic review.选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)与青光眼其他治疗方式的比较:系统评价
Eye (Lond). 2014 Mar;28(3):249-58. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.267. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
10
Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma in Japanese eyes: comparison of 180 degree with 360 degree SLT.选择性激光小梁成形术治疗原发性开角型青光眼的临床疗效:180°与 360° SLT 的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Jan;21(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181fc8020.