Polak Martin, Tanzer Norbert K, Bauernhofer Kathrin, Andersson Gerhard
Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Austria.
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden.
Internet Interv. 2021 Jan 7;24:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100364. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Compared to conventional face-to-face psychological treatments, internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) presents an innovative alternative that has been found to be effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders. The current study provides a meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of disorder-specific guided self-help (Gsh) iCBT compared to various active and inactive control conditions, with focus on adult panic disorder sufferers with or without agoraphobia (PD/A). Systematic literature search yielded 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ( = 1214) that met the eligibility criteria for this study. We found no statistically significant differences between Gsh iCBT and various active CBT interventions in reducing PD/A symptoms at both post-test ( = 0.015, = 10) and follow-up ( = 0.113, = 6) levels. Also, comorbid anxiety and depression were reduced equivalently at post-test ( = 0.004, = 6) and follow-up ( = 0.004, = 6). Quality of life was equally improved at post-test ( = -0.100, = 5) and follow-up ( = 0.074, = 2). When compared to inactive controls, we found large effect sizes in PD/A ( = -0.892, = 9) and comorbid anxiety and depression ( = -0.723, = 9) symptoms, and moderate change in quality of life ( = -0.484, = 3) at post-test. There was no difference between Guided self-help iCBT and Self-help iCBT in PD/A ( = -0.025, = 3) and comorbid anxiety and depression ( = -0.025, = 3) at post-test. Baseline severity, country of original research and adherence to the treatment in form of initial uptake were identified as statistically significant moderators of the iCBT treatment.
与传统的面对面心理治疗相比,基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)是一种创新的替代疗法,已被证明在治疗焦虑症方面有效。本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,调查特定障碍的引导式自助(Gsh)iCBT与各种积极和消极对照条件相比的疗效,重点关注有无广场恐惧症(PD/A)的成年惊恐障碍患者。系统的文献检索产生了13项随机对照试验(RCTs)(n = 1214),这些试验符合本研究的纳入标准。我们发现,在测试后(g = 0.015,k = 10)和随访(g = 0.113,k = 6)水平上,Gsh iCBT与各种积极的CBT干预措施在减轻PD/A症状方面没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,在测试后(g = 0.004,k = 6)和随访(g = 0.004,k = 6)时,共病焦虑和抑郁的减轻程度相当。在测试后(g = -0.100,k = 5)和随访(g = 0.074,k = 2)时,生活质量同样得到改善。与消极对照相比,我们发现在测试后,PD/A(g = -0.892,k = 9)以及共病焦虑和抑郁(g = -0.723,k = 9)症状的效应量较大,生活质量有中度变化(g = -0.484,k = 3)。在测试后,引导式自助iCBT和自助iCBT在PD/A(g = -0.025,k = 3)以及共病焦虑和抑郁(g = -0.025,k = 3)方面没有差异。基线严重程度、原始研究的国家以及以初始接受度形式体现的治疗依从性被确定为iCBT治疗的统计学显著调节因素。