• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过实施听写模板改进内镜检查报告

Improvement of Endoscopic Reports with Implementation of a Dictation Template.

作者信息

Harris Natasha, Telford Jennifer, Yonge Jordan, Galorport Cherry, Amar Jack, Bressler Brian, Brown Carl, Lam Eric, Nap-Hill Estello, Phang Terry, Ramji Alnoor, Suzuki Matthew, Whittaker J Scott, Enns Robert

机构信息

St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 19;4(1):21-26. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz033. eCollection 2021 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwz033
PMID:33644673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7898381/
Abstract

AIMS

Completeness of procedure reports is an important quality indicator in endoscopy. A dictation template was developed to ensure key elements were included in colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) reports. Endoscopy reports were reviewed prior to and following implementation of the dictation templates to determine whether report completeness improved.

METHODS

Key elements in an endoscopic report were identified from published guidelines and posted at dictation stations. Colonoscopy and EGD reports were reviewed for the nine physicians performing endoscopy at St. Paul's Hospital prior to and following implementation of dictation templates. Dictation completeness was defined as inclusion of all key elements. Dictation completeness and inclusion of individual key elements at the two time points were compared using the -test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Reports for 4648 procedures undertaken by nine endoscopists were reviewed for completeness at each time point (2008 and 2014). Colonoscopy report completeness increased from 65.8% to 83.2% ( < 0.001). Items that improved included documentation of consent, endoscope used, complications, withdrawal time and rectal retroflexion. EGD report completeness increased from 72.7% to 77.3% ( < 0.001) with improvement in documentation of consent and complications. Items consistently underreported for colonoscopy and EGD at both time points included: patient age, comorbidities, current medications and patient comfort.

CONCLUSION

There was an association between the use of a posted dictation template at dictation stations and the improved completeness of endoscopic reports.

摘要

目的

操作报告的完整性是内镜检查中的一项重要质量指标。开发了一个听写模板,以确保结肠镜检查和食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)报告中包含关键要素。在实施听写模板之前和之后,对内窥镜检查报告进行了审查,以确定报告的完整性是否得到改善。

方法

从已发表的指南中确定内镜检查报告中的关键要素,并张贴在听写站。在实施听写模板之前和之后,对圣保罗医院进行内镜检查的九位医生的结肠镜检查和EGD报告进行了审查。听写完整性定义为包含所有关键要素。使用t检验和卡方检验比较两个时间点的听写完整性和各个关键要素的包含情况。

结果

在每个时间点(2008年和2014年)对九位内镜医师进行的4648例手术的报告进行了完整性审查。结肠镜检查报告的完整性从65.8%提高到83.2%(P<0.001)。有所改善的项目包括同意书记录、使用的内镜、并发症、退镜时间和直肠反转。EGD报告的完整性从72.7%提高到77.3%(P<0.001),同意书记录和并发症记录有所改善。在两个时间点,结肠镜检查和EGD报告一直报告不足的项目包括:患者年龄、合并症、当前用药和患者舒适度。

结论

在听写站使用张贴的听写模板与内镜检查报告完整性的提高之间存在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0906/7898381/38ead2db054b/gwz033f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0906/7898381/98b77b94e50d/gwz033f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0906/7898381/38ead2db054b/gwz033f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0906/7898381/98b77b94e50d/gwz033f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0906/7898381/38ead2db054b/gwz033f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Improvement of Endoscopic Reports with Implementation of a Dictation Template.通过实施听写模板改进内镜检查报告
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 19;4(1):21-26. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz033. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.基于模板的概要报告对手术病理报告完整性的影响。
Virchows Arch. 2024 Jan;484(1):31-36. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03533-6. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
The quality of gastroenterological reports based on free text dictation: an evaluation in endoscopy and ultrasonography.基于自由文本听写的胃肠病学报告质量:内镜检查和超声检查的评估
Endoscopy. 1991 Sep;23(5):262-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010682.
4
Development of artificial intelligence system for quality control of photo documentation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy.开发用于食管胃十二指肠镜照片文件质量控制的人工智能系统。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08236-6. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Endoscopy reporting standards.内镜检查报告标准。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):286-92. doi: 10.1155/2013/145894.
6
Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术手术记录的完整性。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jul;220(1):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
Role of artificial intelligence-guided esophagogastroduodenoscopy in assessing the procedural completeness and quality.人工智能引导的食管胃十二指肠镜检查在评估操作完整性和质量方面的作用。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;42(1):128-135. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01294-9. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Location, size, and distance: criteria for quality in esophagogastroduodenos copy reporting for pre-operative gastric cancer evaluation.位置、大小和距离:术前胃癌评估中食管胃十二指肠镜检查报告的质量标准
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1660-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3367-8. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Optimal procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation: A prospective randomized study.同一天内进行中度镇静下的双向内镜检查的最佳操作顺序:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;33(3):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13971.
10
Trauma Dictations in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement/Patient Safety Project.急诊科的创伤记录:一项质量改进/患者安全项目
Spartan Med Res J. 2017 Feb 2;1(2):5126. doi: 10.51894/001c.5126.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastroenterologist and surgeon perceptions of recommendations for optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms.胃肠病学家和外科医生对结直肠肿瘤最佳内镜定位建议的看法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63753-x.
2
Adherence to quality indicators and best practices in surveillance endoscopy of Barrett's esophagus: A video-based assessment.巴雷特食管监测内镜检查中对质量指标和最佳实践的遵循:基于视频的评估
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jan 19;12(1):E90-E96. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-3689. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Optimizing Endoscopy Procedure Documentation Improves Guideline-Adherent Care in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures.所有胃肠内镜检查程序共有的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.055. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
2
Endoscopy reporting standards.内镜检查报告标准。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):286-92. doi: 10.1155/2013/145894.
3
The endoscopy Global Rating Scale-Canada: development and implementation of a quality improvement tool.加拿大内镜全球评分量表:一种质量改进工具的开发与应用
优化内镜检查操作记录可改善上消化道出血的指南依从性护理。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2264-2275. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07823-6. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Standard reporting elements for the performance of EUS: Recommendations from the FOCUS working group.超声内镜检查操作的标准报告要素:聚焦工作组的建议
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Mar-Apr;10(2):84-92. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00234.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;27(2):74-82. doi: 10.1155/2013/165804.
4
Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.结肠镜报告的质量审核:针对结直肠肿瘤筛查或监测的患者。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 21;18(27):3551-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551.
5
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.加拿大胃肠病学协会关于内镜检查安全性和质量指标的共识指南
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;26(1):17-31. doi: 10.1155/2012/173739.
6
Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.结肠镜检查报告质量评估:多中心联盟的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034.
7
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4 Suppl):S16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.021.
8
Quality improvement of gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for clinical application. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查质量改进:临床应用指南。源自美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jun;49(6):842-4.