Santos Amanda C, Land Marcelo G P, Lima Elisangela C
Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, PPGCM - FM (Graduate program in medical clinic - medical school), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, University City, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, University City, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;28(3):551-559. doi: 10.1177/1078155221998738. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Allergic hypersensitivity reactions related to enzyme asparaginase may occur during intravenous infusion of drugs and other adverse reactions (non-allergic hypersensitivity and hyperammonemia), which do not require discontinuation of therapy as the first case. It makes differential diagnoses between infusion reactions essential to assure the team regarding the right decision to make after the adverse event. This study evaluated a pharmacovigilance strategy of differentiating infusion reactions to asparaginase in pediatric patients, based on the measurement of serum ammonia and the classification of the reactions by clinical symptoms and severity.
We included children, diagnosed with ALL, and treated with native asparaginase in a university hospital. The professional team monitored and evaluated all asparaginase infusions for continuity of treatment (rechallenge), seeing the measurement of serum ammonia and classification of reactions for type and severity grade. Data from this monitoring was collected retrospectively. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the ratios between serum ammonia concentration posterior and before asparaginase infusion.
245 infusions in 32 patients were monitored, and 19 reactions were observed in 17 children (53%). Three children have hyperammonemia and continue their treatment. The variation of the serum ammonia levels before and after the infusion was statistically significant, comparing the groups with no reaction or hyperammonemia versus the group with the hypersensitivity reaction.
The pharmacovigilance strategy applied in the hospital investigated was a useful and inexpensive tool that supported clinical decision-making and enabled the maintenance of asparaginase therapy for three (9,4%) patients followed up.
与天冬酰胺酶相关的过敏性超敏反应可能在静脉输注药物期间发生,以及其他不良反应(非过敏性超敏反应和高氨血症),首例此类情况并不需要停药。对输注反应进行鉴别诊断对于确保团队在不良事件发生后做出正确决策至关重要。本研究基于血清氨的测量以及根据临床症状和严重程度对反应进行分类,评估了一种区分儿科患者中天冬酰胺酶输注反应的药物警戒策略。
我们纳入了在一家大学医院被诊断为急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)并接受天然天冬酰胺酶治疗的儿童。专业团队监测并评估了所有天冬酰胺酶输注以确定治疗的连续性(再次激发),同时观察血清氨的测量以及反应类型和严重程度分级。此次监测的数据是回顾性收集的。采用卡方检验和曼 - 惠特尼检验来比较天冬酰胺酶输注前后血清氨浓度的比率。
对32例患者的245次输注进行了监测,在17名儿童(53%)中观察到19次反应。三名儿童出现高氨血症并继续接受治疗。比较无反应或高氨血症组与超敏反应组,输注前后血清氨水平的变化具有统计学意义。
在所研究的医院应用的药物警戒策略是一种有用且经济的工具,它支持临床决策制定,并使3名(9.4%)接受随访的患者能够维持天冬酰胺酶治疗。