Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2021 Feb 2;82(2):1-11. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0213. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
AIMS/BACKGROUND: Electronic alerts can help with the early detection of acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients. Evidence for their role in improving patient care is limited. The authors have completed an audit loop to evaluate the impact of electronic alerts, and an associated acute kidney injury management pathway, on patient care.
The audits were conducted at a large tertiary care hospital in the UK. Case notes were reviewed for 99 patients over two periods: pre-alert (in 2013; =55) and post-alert (in 2018; =44), using the same methodology. Patients for case note reviews were randomly chosen from the list of acute kidney injury alerts generated by the local laboratory information management system.
Recognition of acute kidney injury, as documented in the case notes, increased from 15% to 43% between the two periods. Time to first medical review (following electronic alerts) improved by 17 minutes (median 4 hours 4 minutes in 2013 vs 3 hours 47 minutes in 2018). Completion of pre-defined acute kidney injury assessment tasks (review of vital signs, biochemistry and acid-base parameters, evidence of fluid balance assessment, consideration of possible sepsis, and examination or requesting urinalysis) improved in 2018. However, acute kidney injury management tasks (correction of hypovolaemia, addressing or investigating obstruction, medications review, renal referral, requesting of further biochemical tests, addressing possible sepsis) showed very little or no improvement.
The introduction of acute kidney injury electronic alerts and management pathway resulted in improved recognition and initial assessment of patients with acute kidney injury. Further steps are needed to translate this in to improved patient management.
目的/背景:电子警报有助于早期发现住院患者的急性肾损伤。证据表明,电子警报在改善患者护理方面的作用有限。作者已经完成了一个审核循环,以评估电子警报及其相关的急性肾损伤管理途径对患者护理的影响。
该审核在英国的一家大型三级保健医院进行。使用相同的方法,对 99 名患者的病历进行了两次审核:警报前(2013 年;=55)和警报后(2018 年;=44)。病历审核的患者是从当地实验室信息管理系统生成的急性肾损伤警报列表中随机选择的。
病历中记录的急性肾损伤识别率从两个时期的 15%增加到 43%。首次医疗审查(电子警报后)的时间提前了 17 分钟(中位数 2013 年为 4 小时 4 分钟,2018 年为 3 小时 47 分钟)。完成了预先定义的急性肾损伤评估任务(检查生命体征、生化和酸碱参数、液体平衡评估的证据、考虑可能的败血症,以及检查或请求尿液分析)在 2018 年有所改善。然而,急性肾损伤管理任务(纠正低血容量、处理或调查梗阻、药物审查、肾脏转诊、要求进一步的生化检查、处理可能的败血症)几乎没有或没有改善。
引入急性肾损伤电子警报和管理途径改善了对急性肾损伤患者的识别和初始评估。需要采取进一步措施,将这一措施转化为改善患者管理。