• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单字语境下词汇判断中的低约束促进作用。

Low-constraint facilitation in lexical decision with single-word contexts.

作者信息

Lukatela G, Carello C, Kostić A, Turvey M T

机构信息

University of Belgrade, Yugoslavia.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 1988 Spring;101(1):15-29.

PMID:3364614
Abstract

Single-word, low-constraint adjective contexts were used to "prime" lexical decision to noun targets in Serbo-Croat. Semantically congruent situations consisted of adjective-noun pairs that were not highly predictable but were nonetheless plausible (e.g., GOOD-AUNT). Semantically incongruent situations used pairs that were implausible (e.g., SLOW-COAT). All adjective-noun pairs were grammatically congruent and were compared with a neutral XXX baseline. In Experiment 1, at a stimulus onset asynchrony of 300 ms, congruous situations showed 59 ms of facilitation while incongruous situations did not differ from the baseline. The same pattern was repeated in Experiment 2, at a stimulus onset asynchrony of 800 ms. Congruous situations were facilitated 67 ms. Results are discussed in terms of a message-level coherence check in Forster's (1979) model of autonomous levels of language processing.

摘要

在塞尔维亚-克罗地亚语中,单字、低约束性形容词语境被用于“启动”对名词目标的词汇判断。语义一致的情况由不太具有高度可预测性但仍合理的形容词-名词对组成(例如,“好的-阿姨”)。语义不一致的情况使用不合理的对(例如,“慢的-外套”)。所有形容词-名词对在语法上都是一致的,并与中性的XXX基线进行比较。在实验1中,刺激开始异步时间为300毫秒时,一致的情况显示出59毫秒的促进作用,而非一致的情况与基线没有差异。在实验2中,刺激开始异步时间为800毫秒时,重复了相同的模式。一致的情况有67毫秒的促进作用。根据福斯特(1979)自主语言处理层次模型中的信息级连贯检查来讨论结果。

相似文献

1
Low-constraint facilitation in lexical decision with single-word contexts.单字语境下词汇判断中的低约束促进作用。
Am J Psychol. 1988 Spring;101(1):15-29.
2
What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?语义透明度的分级效应揭示了关于形态加工的哪些内容?
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):17-30. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00416-4.
3
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.在语境中理解词汇:阅读过程中词汇与句子层面信息的交互作用。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022.
4
Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words.对词汇歧义单词的N400波幅的情境调节
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.073.
5
Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.词语、同音词和假同音词在联想启动中的策略效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Sep;28(5):951-61.
6
Hemispheric sensitivity to grammatical cues: evidence for bilateral processing of number agreement in noun phrases.大脑半球对语法线索的敏感性:名词短语中数的一致性进行双侧加工的证据。
Brain Lang. 1999 Dec;70(3):483-503. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2185.
7
Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.在词汇处理过程中,整合启动迅速且不受控制地发生。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):112-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014677.
8
On obtaining episodic priming in a lexical decision task following paired-associate learning.在配对联想学习后的词汇判断任务中获得情景启动效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Apr;13(2):206-22. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.2.206.
9
Priming nouns and verbs: differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres.启动名词和动词:语义和语法线索在两个大脑半球中的不同影响。
Brain Lang. 2006 Apr;97(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
10
Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.电生理学研究表明,无论启动刺激加工的深度如何,在短刺激呈现间隔下都会出现语义启动效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 3;453(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax.快速命名受联想影响,但不受句法影响。
Mem Cognit. 1988 May;16(3):187-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03197751.