Dep. of Interprofessional Health Sciences and Health Administration, Seton Hall University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, 123 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ 07110, USA. Tel 973-275-2457, fax 973-275-2171.
J Allied Health. 2021 Spring;50(1):14-28.
Interprofessional education (IPE) must explore the interdependency between healthcare professionals and ensure that IPE learning experiences are rooted in sound teaching and learning theories. Embedding IPE experiences into curricula using an incremental progression rather than "add-on" or "one-and-done" experience provides for continuous development of interprofessional competence by students as part of the learning process. Employing a school-wide structured immersion approach, over a 2-year period, incorporating five core IPE experiences designed to incrementally engage students in deeper, community-rich, person-centered learning experiences that are meaningful and sustainable.
An exploratory mixed-methods approach to collected data during the 2018-2019 academic year of the Core Signature IPE Experiences was employed (I-V). As part of the program review process, students were asked to voluntarily provide anonymous feedback after completion of each Core. Quantitative data was collected using Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). Qualitative data were obtained from responses to open-ended questions added to the demographic component of the survey. The open-ended questions were designed to support, explain, and provide depth to the quantitative section. An elemental coding method was used to preliminarily review the corpus and generate descriptive codes and themes. Descriptive codes summarize in a word or short phrase the basic topic of a qualitative passage.
Quantitative data of IEPS scores demonstrated students' mean scores in high range for each subscale at Core II (5.15) and slightly positive trend observed across three remaining Cores with Core V displaying highest mean score (5.44). From the qualitative survey, descriptive codes were agreed upon by two reviewers as providing the essence of response topic. Qualitative themes support and provide insight into quantitative data.
Recognizing the interdependency which exits between professionals and developing trust and mutual respect among disciplines is paramount to ensuring evidence-based, person-centered healthcare. Infusing IPE learning experiences in the academy can play an important role in student development; however, IPE experiences must be rooted in learning theory. Program review findings from the Core Signature structured immersion experiences used across six health professions offers insight and a sound direction for health profession programs seeking to design IPE experiences that will aid in elevating the standard of healthcare and improving patient outcomes, by creating a collaborative ready workforce.
跨专业教育(IPE)必须探索医疗保健专业人员之间的相互依存关系,并确保 IPE 学习经验根植于完善的教学理论。使用递增式进展而不是“附加”或“一次性”体验将 IPE 经验嵌入课程中,可以为学生提供连续的跨专业能力发展,作为学习过程的一部分。在 2 年的时间里,采用全校范围的结构化沉浸方法,纳入五项核心 IPE 体验,旨在逐步让学生参与更深入、社区丰富、以人为本的学习体验,这些体验具有意义且可持续。
在 2018-2019 学年期间,采用了一种探索性的混合方法来收集核心签名 IPE 体验(I-V)的数据。作为课程审查过程的一部分,学生在完成每个核心后被要求自愿提供匿名反馈。使用跨学科教育感知量表(IEPS)收集定量数据。从问卷调查的开放性问题中获得定性数据。开放性问题旨在支持、解释和深化定量部分。使用元素编码方法初步审查语料库,并生成描述性代码和主题。描述性代码用一个词或短语总结定性段落的基本主题。
IEPS 分数的定量数据表明,学生在核心 II(5.15)中的每个子量表中的平均分数都处于高分范围,并且在其余三个核心中观察到略微积极的趋势,核心 V 显示出最高的平均分数(5.44)。从定性调查中,描述性代码由两位评审员同意,认为它们提供了回答主题的本质。定性主题支持并提供对定量数据的深入了解。
认识到专业人员之间存在的相互依存关系,并在学科之间建立信任和相互尊重,对于确保基于证据的以人为本的医疗保健至关重要。在学院中注入 IPE 学习经验可以在学生发展中发挥重要作用,但 IPE 经验必须根植于学习理论。在六个健康专业中使用的核心签名结构化沉浸体验的课程审查结果为寻求设计 IPE 经验的健康专业计划提供了见解和合理的方向,这些经验将有助于提高医疗保健标准和改善患者结果,通过创建一个协作准备的劳动力。