• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of a Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Medication Safety After Hospitalization in Persons Prescribed High-risk Medications: A Randomized Clinical Trial.多方位临床药师干预对服用高风险药物患者出院后用药安全的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):610-618. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9285.
2
Effect of a pharmacist intervention on clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge: a randomized trial.药师干预对出院后临床重要药物错误的影响:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00003.
3
Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization.药师咨询在预防住院后药物不良事件中的作用。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):565-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.565.
4
Multicomponent Pharmacist Intervention Did Not Reduce Clinically Important Medication Errors for Ambulatory Patients Initiating Direct Oral Anticoagulants.多组分药剂师干预并未减少起始直接口服抗凝剂的门诊患者的临床重要药物差错。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3526-3534. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08315-z. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Rationale and design of the Pharmacist Intervention for Low Literacy in Cardiovascular Disease (PILL-CVD) study.心血管疾病低识字率患者的药剂师干预研究(PILL-CVD)的原理与设计
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):212-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.921833.
6
On-ward participation of a hospital pharmacist in a Dutch intensive care unit reduces prescribing errors and related patient harm: an intervention study.医院药剂师参与荷兰重症监护病房可减少处方错误和相关的患者伤害:一项干预研究。
Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R174. doi: 10.1186/cc9278. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
7
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.药师主导的教育干预对老年人不合理用药处方的影响:D-PRESCRIBE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131.
8
Impact of medication reconciliation and review and counselling, on adverse drug events and healthcare resource use.药物重整、审查与咨询对药物不良事件及医疗资源利用的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1154-1164. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0650-8. Epub 2018 May 12.
9
Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit.药剂师参与重症监护病房的医师查房及药物不良事件
JAMA. 1999 Jul 21;282(3):267-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.3.267.
10
Effect of Medication Reconciliation at Hospital Admission on 30-Day Returns to Hospital: A Randomized Clinical Trial.入院时药物重整对 30 天内返院的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24672.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of AI-assisted multi-advisor system combined with BOPPPS teaching model in clinical pharmacy education.人工智能辅助多导师系统结合BOPPPS教学模式在临床药学教育中的应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 27;25(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07394-2.
2
Emergency Department Visits for Medication-Related Events With vs Without Pharmacist Intervention: The URGEIM Randomized Clinical Trial.有药师干预与无药师干预情况下与药物相关事件的急诊科就诊情况:URGEIM随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0640.
3
Interprofessional approach to personalized medication management and therapy optimization in IBD care.炎症性肠病护理中个性化药物管理和治疗优化的跨专业方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 29;12:1446695. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1446695. eCollection 2025.
4
Pharmacist-Led Management Model and Medication Adherence Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.药剂师主导的管理模式与慢性心力衰竭患者的药物依从性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2453976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53976.
5
Pharmacist-led interventions at hospital discharge: a scoping review of studies demonstrating reduced readmission rates.药师主导的出院干预措施:对显示再入院率降低的研究的范围综述
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01821-y. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
6
A study of pharmacists-joint total parenteral nutrition in haematopoietic cell transplantation in accord with diagnosis related groups: A retrospective clinical research.一项根据诊断相关分组对造血细胞移植中药剂师参与全胃肠外营养的研究:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jun 25;17(1):2361320. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2361320. eCollection 2024.
7
Optimisation of medication reconciliation using queueing theory: a computer experiment.运用排队论优化用药重整:一项计算机实验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Aug;46(4):881-888. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on medication errors at hospital discharge and healthcare utilization in the next 30 days: a pragmatic clinical trial.药师主导的用药核对对出院时用药错误及未来30天医疗保健利用情况的有效性:一项实用性临床试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1377781. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1377781. eCollection 2024.
9
Comprehensive Pharmacist-led Transitions-of-care Medication Management around Hospital Discharge Adds Modest Cost Relative to Usual Care: Time-and-Motion Cost Analysis.全面药师主导的出院过渡期药物管理相对于常规护理会增加适度成本:时间和动作成本分析。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231218625. doi: 10.1177/00469580231218625.
10
Identifying and mapping measures of medication safety during transfer of care in a digital era: a scoping literature review.数字时代护理转接过程中药物安全措施的识别与映射:一项范围综述
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Feb 19;33(3):173-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015859.

多方位临床药师干预对服用高风险药物患者出院后用药安全的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of a Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Medication Safety After Hospitalization in Persons Prescribed High-risk Medications: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester.

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):610-618. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9285.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9285
PMID:33646267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7922235/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The National Action Plan for Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Prevention identified 3 high-priority, high-risk drug classes as targets for reducing the risk of drug-related injuries: anticoagulants, diabetes agents, and opioids.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a multifaceted clinical pharmacist intervention improves medication safety for patients who are discharged from the hospital and prescribed medications within 1 or more of these high-risk drug classes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a large multidisciplinary group practice in Massachusetts and included patients 50 years or older who were discharged from the hospital and prescribed at least 1 high-risk medication. Participants were enrolled into the trial from June 2016 through September 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

The pharmacist-directed intervention included an in-home assessment by a clinical pharmacist, evidence-based educational resources, communication with the primary care team, and telephone follow-up. Participants in the control group were provided educational materials via mail.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The study assessed 2 outcomes over a 45-day posthospital discharge period: (1) adverse drug-related incidents and (2) a subset defined as clinically important medication errors, which included preventable or ameliorable ADEs and potential ADEs (ie, medication-related errors that may not yet have caused injury to a patient, but have the potential to cause future harm if not addressed). Clinically important medication errors were the primary study outcome.

RESULTS

There were 361 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [9.3] years; 177 women [49.0%]; 319 White [88.4%] and 8 Black individuals [2.2%]). Of these, 180 (49.9%) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 181 (50.1%) to the control group. Among all participants, 100 (27.7%) experienced 1 or more adverse drug-related incidents, and 65 (18%) experienced 1 or more clinically important medication errors. There were 81 adverse drug-related incidents identified in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. There were 44 clinically important medication errors in the intervention group and 45 in the control group. The intervention did not significantly alter the per-patient rate of adverse drug-related incidents (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.83-1.56) or clinically important medication errors (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.65-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, there was not an observed lower rate of adverse drug-related incidents or clinically important medication errors during the posthospitalization period that was associated with a clinical pharmacist intervention. However, there were study recruitment challenges and lower than expected numbers of events among the study population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02781662.

摘要

重要性

《国家药物不良事件预防行动计划》确定了 3 种高优先级、高风险药物类别作为降低药物相关伤害风险的目标:抗凝剂、糖尿病药物和阿片类药物。

目的

确定多方面临床药师干预是否能提高从医院出院并在出院后 1 天或以上服用这些高风险药物类别的患者的用药安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验在马萨诸塞州的一家大型多学科实践机构进行,纳入了 50 岁及以上的患者,他们从医院出院并至少服用了 1 种高风险药物。参与者于 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 9 月期间入组该试验。

干预措施

药师指导的干预措施包括临床药师的家庭评估、基于证据的教育资源、与初级保健团队的沟通以及电话随访。对照组的参与者通过邮件获得教育材料。

主要结局和测量

研究评估了出院后 45 天内的 2 个结果:(1)药物不良相关事件,(2)一个亚组定义为临床上重要的药物错误,包括可预防或可改善的药物不良事件和潜在药物不良事件(即可能尚未对患者造成伤害但如果不解决可能会对患者造成未来伤害的药物相关错误)。临床上重要的药物错误是主要的研究结果。

结果

共有 361 名参与者(平均[SD]年龄,68.7[9.3]岁;177 名女性[49.0%];319 名白人[88.4%]和 8 名黑人[2.2%])。其中 180 名(49.9%)被随机分配到干预组,181 名(50.1%)分到对照组。所有参与者中,100 名(27.7%)发生了 1 次或多次药物不良相关事件,65 名(18%)发生了 1 次或多次临床上重要的药物错误。干预组发生 81 起药物不良相关事件,对照组发生 72 起。干预组发生 44 起临床上重要的药物错误,对照组发生 45 起。干预并没有显著降低药物不良相关事件的患者发生率(未调整的发生率比,1.13;95%CI,0.83-1.56)或临床上重要的药物错误发生率(未调整的发生率比,0.99;95%CI,0.65-1.49)。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,与临床药师干预相关的,在出院后期间并没有观察到药物不良相关事件或临床上重要的药物错误发生率较低。然而,研究招募存在挑战,并且研究人群中的事件数量低于预期。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02781662。