• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雇主-供应商直接支付计划与较低的医疗费用有关。

An Employer-Provider Direct Payment Program Is Associated With Lower Episode Costs.

机构信息

Christopher M. Whaley (

Christoph Dankert is senior vice president of provider partnerships at Carrum Health, in San Mateo, California.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):445-452. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01488.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01488
PMID:33646875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9939257/
Abstract

Bundled payment has shown promise in reducing medical spending while maintaining quality. However, its impact among commercially insured populations has not been well studied. We examined the impacts on episode cost and patient cost sharing of a program that applies bundled payments for orthopedic and surgical procedures in a commercially insured population. The program we studied negotiates preferred prices for selected providers that cover the procedure and all related care within a thirty-day period after the procedure and waives cost sharing for patients who receive care from these providers. After implementation, episode prices for three selected surgical procedures declined by $4,229, a 10.7 percent relative reduction. Employers captured approximately 85 percent of the savings, or $3,582 per episode (a 9.5 percent relative decrease), and patient cost-sharing payments decreased by $498 per episode (a 27.7 percent relative decrease).

摘要

打包支付在降低医疗支出的同时保持质量方面显示出了前景。然而,其在商业保险人群中的影响尚未得到很好的研究。我们研究了在商业保险人群中实施一种针对骨科和外科手术的捆绑支付计划对住院费用和患者自付费用的影响。我们研究的项目为选定的提供者协商优惠价格,这些提供者涵盖手术以及手术后 30 天内的所有相关护理,并免除接受这些提供者护理的患者的自付费用。实施后,三种选定的手术的住院费用下降了 4229 美元,相对减少了 10.7%。雇主获得了大约 85%的节省,即每个病例 3582 美元(相对减少 9.5%),患者自付费用每个病例减少了 498 美元(相对减少 27.7%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/370e12da9c07/nihms-1867444-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/e83f294bd9bd/nihms-1867444-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/0b5ea06156e2/nihms-1867444-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/370e12da9c07/nihms-1867444-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/e83f294bd9bd/nihms-1867444-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/0b5ea06156e2/nihms-1867444-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d36/9939257/370e12da9c07/nihms-1867444-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
An Employer-Provider Direct Payment Program Is Associated With Lower Episode Costs.雇主-供应商直接支付计划与较低的医疗费用有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):445-452. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01488.
2
Cost of Joint Replacement Using Bundled Payment Models.采用打包付费模式的关节置换成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8263.
3
Medicare's Bundled Payment Initiatives for Hospital-Initiated Episodes: Evidence and Evolution.医疗保险对医院发起的疾病诊治整体支付计划:证据与演变。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):908-974. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
4
How Patient Complexity and Surgical Approach Influence Episode-Based Payment Models for Colectomy.患者复杂性和手术方法如何影响结直肠切除术的基于病种付费模式。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jun;62(6):739-746. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001372.
5
Design and impact of bundled payment for detox and follow-up care.捆绑支付在戒毒和随访护理中的设计和影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Nov;82:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Association of bundled payments with spending, utilization, and quality for surgical conditions: A scoping review.捆绑支付与手术条件的支出、利用和质量的关联:范围综述。
Am J Surg. 2024 Mar;229:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.12.009. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
7
Robotic total knee arthroplasty: A missed opportunity for cost savings in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement initiatives?机器人全膝关节置换术:在“改善医疗服务付费改革”捆绑支付中节省成本的错失机会?
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.046. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Variation in Bariatric Surgery Episode Costs in the Commercially Insured: Implications for Bundled Payments in the Private Sector.商业保险患者减重手术费用的变化:对私营部门打包支付的影响。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):1014-1018. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002462.
9
What Factors are Associated With 90-day Episode-of-care Payments for Younger Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些因素与年轻全关节置换术患者的90天护理期支付相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2808-2818. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5444-0. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Target Prices Influence Hospital Participation And Shared Savings In Medicare Bundled Payment Program.目标价格影响医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划的情况及共享节约额。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1479-1485. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00104.

引用本文的文献

1
How Benchmark Changes Affect Participation in Accountable Care Organizations: Prospects for Voluntary Payment Models.基准变化如何影响对 accountable care organizations 的参与:自愿支付模式的前景。
Am J Health Econ. 2025 Winter;11(1):38-62. doi: 10.1086/726748. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Employer-Sponsored Health Centers Provide Access to Integrated Care via a Hybrid of Virtual and In-Person Visits.雇主赞助的健康中心通过虚拟就诊和面对面就诊相结合的方式提供综合医疗服务。
Telemed Rep. 2021 Nov 2;2(1):247-257. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0027. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Prices Paid to Hospitals by Private Health Plans Are High Relative to Medicare and Vary Widely: Findings from an Employer-Led Transparency Initiative.与医疗保险相比,私人健康保险计划支付给医院的费用较高且差异很大:雇主主导的透明度倡议的调查结果。
Rand Health Q. 2021 Aug 16;9(2):5. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
THE PRICE AIN'T RIGHT? HOSPITAL PRICES AND HEALTH SPENDING ON THE PRIVATELY INSURED.价格不合理?医院价格与私人保险人群的医疗支出
Q J Econ. 2019 Feb;134(1):51-107. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjy020. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Spending and quality after three years of Medicare's bundled payments for medical conditions: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.
医保捆绑付费政策实施三年后对医疗状况的支出和质量的影响:准实验双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 17;369:m1780. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1780.
4
Surprise Billing in Surgical Care Episodes - Overview, Ethical Concerns, and Policy Solutions in Light of COVID-19.外科护理事件中的意外账单——鉴于新冠疫情的概述、伦理问题及政策解决方案
Ann Surg. 2020 Oct;272(4):e264-e265. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004152.
5
"Surprise" Out-of-network Billing in Orthopedic Surgery: Charges From Surprising Sources.骨科手术中的“意外”网络外计费:来自意外来源的费用
Ann Surg. 2020 May;271(5):e116-e118. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003825.
6
If reference-based benefit designs work, why are they not widely adopted? Insurers and administrators not doing enough to address price variation.如果基于参考的福利设计行之有效,为何未被广泛采用?保险公司和管理人员在应对价格差异方面做得不够。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):344-347. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13284. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
7
Out-of-Network Bills for Privately Insured Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With In-Network Primary Surgeons and Facilities.有保险的患者选择网络内医生和机构进行择期手术时的网络外账单。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):538-547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21463.
8
When Should Medicare Mandate Participation In Alternative Payment Models?医疗保险应在何时强制要求参与替代支付模式?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):305-309. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00570.
9
Spending And Quality After Three Years Of Medicare's Voluntary Bundled Payment For Joint Replacement Surgery.医保自愿捆绑支付关节置换手术三年后的支出和质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):58-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00466.
10
The Impact Of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review.捆绑式支付对医疗保健支出、利用和质量的影响:系统评价。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):50-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00784.