Suppr超能文献

用于治疗常见疾病的畅销孤儿药的孤儿适应症支出。

Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases.

机构信息

Kao-Ping Chua (

Lauren E. Kimmel is a law student at the University of Michigan School of Law. She was a research assistant in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Michigan when this work was performed.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):453-460. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01442.

Abstract

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 provides benefits to promote the development of treatments for rare diseases that have limited sales potential. Policy makers have questioned whether this purpose is furthered in the case of "partial orphan drugs" approved to treat both rare and common diseases, as many of these drugs are top sellers. In this study we used national commercial claims data to estimate the proportion of spending in the US on fifteen top-selling partial orphan drugs that was assigned to orphan indications in 2018. Of this spending, 21.4 percent was assigned to orphan indications, 70.7 percent to nonorphan indications, and 7.9 percent to neither orphan nor nonorphan indications (for example, off-label use). These findings support growing concerns regarding the costs of granting orphan drug benefits to the sponsors of top-selling partial orphan drugs.

摘要

1983 年的《孤儿药法案》为促进治疗罕见疾病的治疗方法的开发提供了益处,这些治疗方法的销售潜力有限。政策制定者质疑,在批准用于治疗罕见病和常见病的“部分孤儿药”的情况下,这一目的是否得到了进一步推进,因为许多此类药物都是畅销药。在这项研究中,我们使用国家商业索赔数据来估计 2018 年美国在 15 种畅销的部分孤儿药上的支出中,有多少被分配给孤儿适应症。在这部分支出中,21.4%被分配给孤儿适应症,70.7%被分配给非孤儿适应症,7.9%既不分配给孤儿适应症也不分配给非孤儿适应症(例如,标签外使用)。这些发现支持了人们对给予畅销部分孤儿药赞助商孤儿药福利的成本的日益关注。

相似文献

1
Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):453-460. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01442.
2
The prevalence and cost of unapproved uses of top-selling orphan drugs.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031894. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
3
Orphan Drug Label Expansions: Analysis Of Subsequent Rare And Common Indication Approvals.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jan;43(1):18-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00219.
4
Pediatric Orphan Drug Indications: 2010-2018.
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3128. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Modifying the Criteria for Granting Orphan Drug Market Exclusivity.
Value Health. 2020 Nov;23(11):1470-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Novel Treatments for Rare Cancers: The U.S. Orphan Drug Act Is Delivering-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Oncologist. 2016 Apr;21(4):487-93. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0397. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1588-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0030.
10
The Orphan Drug Act: Restoring the Mission to Rare Diseases.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;39(2):210-3. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000251.

引用本文的文献

1
Value-Based Indication-Specific Pricing and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Apr;43(4):415-427. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01448-x. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Pharmaceutical policy and innovation for rare diseases: A narrative review.
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 13;12:211. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130809.2. eCollection 2023.
3
The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success.
Milbank Q. 2024 Mar;102(1):83-96. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12680. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):117-131. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01320-4. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
8
Current Understanding on the Genetic Basis of Key Metabolic Disorders: A Review.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;11(9):1308. doi: 10.3390/biology11091308.
9
Assessing the value of orphan drugs using conventional cost-effectiveness analysis: Is it fit for purpose?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Apr 5;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02283-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Orphan Drugs Offer Larger Health Gains but Less Favorable Cost-effectiveness than Non-orphan Drugs.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05805-2. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
The unintended consequences of the 340B safety-net drug discount program.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):153-156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13281. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
3
4
CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Microcosm for the Challenges Ahead in Medicare.
JAMA. 2019 Sep 10;322(10):923-924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10194.
5
Reforming the Orphan Drug Act for the 21st Century.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):106-108. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1902943.
6
Out-of-pocket Spending on Orphan Drug Prescriptions Among Commercially Insured Adults in 2014.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):338-340. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4694-1.
7
Evaluating The Impact Of The Orphan Drug Act's Seven-Year Market Exclusivity Period.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):732-737. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1179.
8
Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1588-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0030.
9
Indication-specific pricing for cancer drugs.
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1629-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13235.
10
What is wrong with orphan drug policies?
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验