• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始背驮式技术有助于晚期肝再移植——一项回顾性单中心研究。

Initial piggyback technique facilitates late liver retransplantation - a retrospective monocentric study.

机构信息

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2021 May;34(5):835-843. doi: 10.1111/tri.13857. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1111/tri.13857
PMID:33650170
Abstract

Optimal management of inferior vena cava (IVC) is crucial to ensure safety in late liver retransplantation (ReLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate different surgical strategies with regard to IVC in late ReLT. All consecutive late ReLT (≥90 days from the previous transplant) from 2013 to 2018 in a single center was reviewed (n = 66). Of them, 46 (69.7%) were performed without venovenous bypass (VVB) including 29 with caval preservation (CP) and 17 with caval replacement (CR). The remaining 20 cases (30.3%) required the use of VVB. Among ReLT without VVB, CP was associated with a lower number of packed red blood cells (median 4 vs. 7; P = 0.016) and a lower incidence of post-transplant acute kidney injury (6.9% vs. 47.1%; P = 0.003). The feasibility of CP was 95% (14/15) in patients with previous 3-vein piggyback caval anastomosis versus 48.3% (15/31) after other techniques (P = 0.003). Indirect signs of portal hypertension (PHT) before retransplantation were predictive of VVB requirement. Early and long-term outcomes were similar across the three groups (CP without VVB, CR without VVB, and VVB). Preserving the IVC in late ReLT is associated with better postoperative renal function and is facilitated by a previous 3-vein piggyback. Routine CR is not justified in late ReLT.

摘要

下腔静脉(IVC)的最佳管理对于确保晚期肝再次移植(ReLT)的安全性至关重要。本研究旨在评估不同的手术策略在晚期 ReLT 中对 IVC 的影响。对 2013 年至 2018 年在一家中心进行的所有连续晚期 ReLT(前次移植后≥90 天)进行了回顾性分析(n=66)。其中,46 例(69.7%)未行静脉-静脉旁路(VVB),包括 29 例保留下腔静脉(CP)和 17 例下腔静脉置换(CR)。其余 20 例(30.3%)需要使用 VVB。在无 VVB 的 ReLT 中,CP 与更少的红细胞悬液(中位数 4 比 7;P=0.016)和更低的术后急性肾损伤发生率(6.9%比 47.1%;P=0.003)相关。在既往行三静脉搭桥下腔静脉吻合的患者中,CP 的可行性为 95%(14/15),而在其他技术后为 48.3%(15/31)(P=0.003)。再次移植前门静脉高压(PHT)的间接征象是需要 VVB 的预测因素。三组(无 VVB 的 CP、无 VVB 的 CR 和 VVB)的早期和长期结局相似。在晚期 ReLT 中保留 IVC 与术后肾功能改善相关,并且有利于既往的三静脉搭桥。常规的 CR 在晚期 ReLT 中是不合理的。

相似文献

1
Initial piggyback technique facilitates late liver retransplantation - a retrospective monocentric study.初始背驮式技术有助于晚期肝再移植——一项回顾性单中心研究。
Transpl Int. 2021 May;34(5):835-843. doi: 10.1111/tri.13857. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Piggyback technique and selective use of veno-venous bypass in adult orthotopic liver transplantation.成人原位肝移植中的背驮技术及静脉-静脉转流的选择性应用
Clin Transplant. 2000 Aug;14(4 Pt 2):370-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.14040202.x.
3
Comparison of surgical methods in liver transplantation: retrohepatic caval resection with venovenous bypass (VVB) versus piggyback (PB) with VVB versus PB without VVB.肝移植手术方法比较:肝后下腔静脉切除术伴静脉-静脉转流术(VVB)与背驮式(PB)联合 VVB 与 PB 不联合 VVB。
Transpl Int. 2010 Dec;23(12):1247-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01144.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
4
Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation.无静脉-静脉转流及无门腔分流的成人肝腔静脉肝移植及再次肝移植:成人肝移植的一项前瞻性可行性研究
Transplantation. 2003 May 27;75(10):1740-5. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000061613.66081.09.
5
The effects of venovenous bypass use in liver transplantation with piggyback technique: a propensity score-weighted analysis.背驮式肝移植中使用静脉-静脉转流的效果:倾向评分加权分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;19(5):1405-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03530-w. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
6
The need for venovenous bypass in liver transplantation.肝移植中静脉-静脉旁路的需求。
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(3):196-203. doi: 10.1080/13651820801953031.
7
Experience with the piggyback technique without caval occlusion in adult orthotopic liver transplantation.成人原位肝移植中不阻断腔静脉的背驮式技术经验。
Transplantation. 1998 Jan 15;65(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199801150-00015.
8
Hepato-venous reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the recipients' inferior vena cava and veno-venous bypass.原位肝移植中保留受体下腔静脉和静脉-静脉转流的肝静脉重建术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;385(5):350-6. doi: 10.1007/s004230000149.
9
Randomized trial comparing pulmonary alterations after conventional with venovenous bypass versus piggyback liver transplantation.比较传统静脉-静脉转流与背驮式肝移植术后肺部改变的随机试验。
Liver Transpl. 2004 Mar;10(3):425-33. doi: 10.1002/lt.20067.
10
Different cava reconstruction techniques in liver transplantation: piggyback versus cava resection.肝移植中不同的腔静脉重建技术:背驮式与腔静脉切除术
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Jun;13(3):242-9. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60250-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Liver Retransplantation in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者肝再次移植的结果
Liver Int. 2025 Jan;45(1):e16214. doi: 10.1111/liv.16214.
2
Indications and Outcomes with Liver Retransplantation in 2025.2025年肝脏再次移植的适应症与结果
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08741-x. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Challenges in Pediatric Liver Retransplantation: A Technical Perspective.小儿肝脏再次移植的挑战:技术视角
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;11(9):1079. doi: 10.3390/children11091079.