• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉根部置换治疗感染性心内膜炎的长期疗效。

Long-term outcomes of aortic root replacement for endocarditis.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Duke University Medical School.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):1969-1978. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15472. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.15472
PMID:33651483
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) involving the aortic valve and root is associated with high risk requiring thoughtful surgical decision-making. The impact of valve and conduit choices and patient factors on long-term outcomes in this patient population is poorly documented.

METHODS

From January 1976 to December 2013, 485 patients underwent aortic root and valve replacement at a single institution. Cox's proportional hazard model identified predictors of long-term survival and cumulative incidence functions were compared to assess need for reoperation with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Median age at time of operation was 56.6 years (interquartile range: 23.1) with the indication for operation being endocarditis in 14.6% (n = 71). Stentless root replacement was used in 70% IE versus 34% non-IE (p < .001). Endocarditis at time of root replacement did not have a significant impact on survival through 15 years (IE: 37.3% vs. non-IE: 42.5%; log-rank; p = .13). After multivariable adjustment, survival was similar between patients with and without endocarditis (hazard ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence interval: [0.77, 1.62]; p = .57). Freedom from reoperation at 15 years did not vary significantly by endocarditis status (IE: 95.9% vs. non-IE: 73.6%; p = .07). Among endocarditis patients, freedom from reoperation at 10 years was similar between homograft and stentless bioprosthetic conduits (95.3% vs. 88.5%; log-rank; K-sample; p = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

In a sample with frequent use of stentless prostheses, aortic root replacement for infective endocarditis had acceptable risk and long-term survival similar to root replacement for other indications. In the setting of endocarditis, root replacement with homograft or stentless bioprosthetic root has excellent durability through 15 years.

摘要

背景

感染性心内膜炎(IE)累及主动脉瓣和根部与高风险相关,需要慎重的手术决策。然而,该患者人群中,瓣膜和管道选择以及患者因素对长期结果的影响记录甚少。

方法

1976 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月,485 例患者在一家机构接受了主动脉根部和瓣膜置换术。Cox 比例风险模型确定了长期生存的预测因素,并比较了累积发生率函数,以评估因死亡而出现的再次手术的需要作为竞争风险。

结果

手术时的中位年龄为 56.6 岁(四分位距:23.1),手术指征为感染性心内膜炎占 14.6%(n=71)。无支架根部置换术在感染性心内膜炎患者中的使用率为 70%,而非感染性心内膜炎患者为 34%(p<.001)。在 15 年的随访中,心内膜炎患者的生存情况并未明显影响(感染性心内膜炎:37.3% vs. 非感染性心内膜炎:42.5%;对数秩检验;p=0.13)。多变量调整后,心内膜炎患者和非心内膜炎患者的生存情况相似(风险比:1.1;95%置信区间:[0.77,1.62];p=0.57)。15 年时,再次手术的无复发率在感染性心内膜炎患者中无显著差异(感染性心内膜炎:95.9% vs. 非感染性心内膜炎:73.6%;p=0.07)。在心内膜炎患者中,同种异体移植物和无支架生物瓣在 10 年时的无再次手术率相似(95.3% vs. 88.5%;对数秩检验;K 样本;p=0.46)。

结论

在支架使用率较高的患者中,感染性心内膜炎患者主动脉根部置换术的风险可接受,长期生存率与其他适应证的患者相似。在心内膜炎患者中,同种异体移植物或无支架生物瓣的根部置换术在 15 年内具有极好的耐用性。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of aortic root replacement for endocarditis.主动脉根部置换治疗感染性心内膜炎的长期疗效。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jun;36(6):1969-1978. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15472. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Surgical Options for Aortic Root Replacement in Destructive Endocarditis.破坏性心内膜炎主动脉根部替换的手术选择。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):265-273. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0020.
3
Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者行外科主动脉瓣置换时机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜假体的比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):386-392. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz122.
4
Outcomes of Patients after Implantation of the Pericardial All-Biological Valve No-React Aortic Conduit (BioIntegral) for Root Replacement in Complex Surgical Procedures.在复杂外科手术中植入心包全生物无反应主动脉管道(BioIntegral)进行根部置换后患者的预后情况。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun;68(4):301-308. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683425. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Homograft Versus Conventional Prosthesis for Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.同种异体移植物与传统人工瓣膜用于主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎手术治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):163-170. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000510.
6
Stentless vs Stented Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the Small Aortic Root.小主动脉根部的无支架与有支架主动脉瓣生物假体
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28(2):390-397. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Treatment of aortic valve endocarditis with stented or stentless valve.带支架或无支架瓣膜治疗主动脉瓣心内膜炎。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):480-487.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.068. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
8
Stentless bioprostheses: a versatile and durable solution in extensive aortic valve endocarditis.无支架生物假体:广泛主动脉瓣心内膜炎的一种通用且持久的解决方案。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jun;49(6):1699-704. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv463. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
In patients with severe active aortic valve endocarditis, is a stentless valve as good as the homograft?在重症活动性主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者中,无支架瓣膜与同种异体移植瓣膜的效果一样好吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;11(3):309-13. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.234831. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
10
Are homografts superior to conventional prosthetic valves in the setting of infective endocarditis involving the aortic valve?在累及主动脉瓣的感染性心内膜炎情况下,同种异体移植物是否优于传统人工瓣膜?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1239-46, 1248.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.061. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary surgical management of infective endocarditis of the aortic root.主动脉根部感染性心内膜炎的当代外科治疗
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;40(Suppl 1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01604-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.