Sports Performance Laboratory, Sports Medicine Program, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Nutrition Department, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Oct;46(10):1179-1188. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0880. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Low energy availability (EA) suppresses many physiological processes, including ovarian function in female athletes. Low EA could also predispose athletes to develop a state of overreaching. This study compared the changes in ad libitum energy intake (EI), exercise energy expenditure (ExEE), and EA among runners completing a training overload (TO) phase. We tested the hypothesis that runners becoming overreached would show decreased EA, suppressed ovarian function and plasma leptin, compared with well-adapted (WA) runners. After 1 menstrual cycle (baseline), 16 eumenorrheic runners performed 4 weeks of TO followed by a 2-week recovery (131 ± 3% and 63 ± 6% of baseline running volume, respectively). Seven-day ExEE, EI, running performance (RUN) and plasma leptin concentration were assessed for each phase. Salivary estradiol concentration was measured daily. Urinary luteinizing hormone concentration tests confirmed ovulation. Nine runners adapted positively to TO (WA, ΔRUN: +4 ± 2%); 7 were non-functionally overreached (NFOR; ΔRUN: -9 ± 2%) as RUN remained suppressed after the recovery period. WA increased EI during TO, maintaining their baseline EA despite a increase in ExEE (ΔEA = +1.9 ± 1.3 kcal·kg fat free mass (FFM)·d, = 0.17). By contrast, NFOR showed no change in EI, leading to decreased EA (ΔEA = -5.6 ± 2.1 kcal·kg FFM·d, = 0.04). Plasma leptin concentration mid-cycle and luteal salivary estradiol concentration decreased in NFOR only. Contrasting with WA, NFOR failed to maintain baseline EA during TO, resulting in poor performance outcomes and suppressed ovarian function. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02224976. Runners adapting positively to training overload (TO) increased ad libitum energy intake, maintaining baseline EA and ovarian function through TO. By contrast, NFOR runners failed to increase energy intake, showing suppressed EA and ovarian function during TO.
低能量状态(EA)会抑制许多生理过程,包括女性运动员的卵巢功能。低 EA 还可能使运动员更容易过度训练。本研究比较了在完成训练超负荷(TO)阶段的跑步者中,随意能量摄入(EI)、运动能量消耗(ExEE)和 EA 的变化。我们假设过度训练的跑步者与适应良好的(WA)跑步者相比,EA 会降低,卵巢功能和血浆瘦素受到抑制。在 1 个月经周期(基线)后,16 名月经正常的跑步者进行了 4 周的 TO,随后进行了 2 周的恢复期(分别为基线跑步量的 131±3%和 63±6%)。每个阶段都评估了 7 天的 ExEE、EI、跑步表现(RUN)和血浆瘦素浓度。每天测量唾液雌二醇浓度。尿黄体生成素浓度测试确认排卵。9 名跑步者对 TO 适应良好(WA,ΔRUN:+4±2%);7 名跑步者因在恢复期后 RUN 仍受到抑制而被非功能性过度训练(NFOR;ΔRUN:-9±2%)。WA 在 TO 期间增加了 EI,尽管 ExEE 增加,但仍保持其基线 EA(Δ EA =+1.9±1.3 kcal·kg 去脂体重(FFM)·d, = 0.17)。相比之下,NFOR 的 EI 没有变化,导致 EA 降低(Δ EA =-5.6±2.1 kcal·kg FFM·d, = 0.04)。只有 NFOR 中,中周期血浆瘦素浓度和黄体唾液雌二醇浓度下降。与 WA 相比,NFOR 在 TO 期间未能维持基线 EA,导致表现不佳和卵巢功能抑制。ClinicalTrials.gov 编号 NCT02224976。适应训练超负荷(TO)的跑步者增加随意能量摄入,通过 TO 维持基线 EA 和卵巢功能。相比之下,NFOR 跑步者未能增加能量摄入,在 TO 期间表现出 EA 和卵巢功能抑制。