Dalton Michael K, Jarman Molly P, Manful Adoma, Koehlmoos Tracey P, Cooper Zara, Weissman Joel S, Schoenfeld Andrew J
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814; and.
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):159-164. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004844. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
We sought to evaluate long-term healthcare requirements of American military servicemembers with combat-related injuries.
US military conflicts since 2001 have produced the most combat casualties since Vietnam. Long-term consequences on healthcare utilization and associated costs remain unknown.
We identified servicemembers who were treated for combat-related injuries between 2007 and 2011. Controls consisted of active-duty servicemembers injured in the civilian sector, without any history of combat-related trauma, matched (1:1) on year of injury, biologic sex injury severity, and age at time of injury. Surveillance was performed through 2018. Total annual healthcare expenditures were evaluated overall and then as expenditures in the first year after injury and for subsequent years. Negative binomial regression was used to identify the adjusted influence of combat injury on healthcare costs.
The combat-injured cohort consisted of 3981 individuals and we identified 3979 controls. Total healthcare utilization during the follow-up period resulted in median costs of $142,214 (IQR $61,428, $323,060) per combat-injured servicemember as compared to $50,741 (IQR $26,669, $104,134) among controls. Median expenditures, adjusted for duration of follow-up, for the combat-injured were $45,211 (IQR $18,698, $105,437). In adjusted analysis, overall costs were 30% higher (1.30; 95% confidence interval: 1.23, 1.37) for combat-injured personnel.
This investigation represents the longest continuous observation of healthcare utilization among individuals after combat injury and the first to assess costs. Expenditures were 30% higher for individuals injured as a result of combat-related trauma when compared to those injured in the civilian sector.
我们试图评估美国作战相关受伤军人的长期医疗保健需求。
自2001年以来,美国军事冲突造成了自越南战争以来最多的战斗伤亡。对医疗保健利用和相关成本的长期影响仍然未知。
我们确定了2007年至2011年期间因作战相关受伤接受治疗的军人。对照组由在民用部门受伤的现役军人组成,没有任何作战相关创伤史,根据受伤年份、生物学性别、损伤严重程度和受伤时年龄进行(1:1)匹配。监测持续到2018年。总体评估了年度医疗保健总支出,然后分别评估受伤后第一年和随后几年的支出。使用负二项回归来确定作战受伤对医疗保健成本的调整影响。
作战受伤队列由3981人组成,我们确定了3979名对照组。随访期间的总医疗保健利用率导致每名作战受伤军人的中位成本为142,214美元(四分位距61,428美元,323,060美元),而对照组为50,741美元(四分位距26,669美元,104,134美元)。根据随访时间调整后的作战受伤军人中位支出为45,211美元(四分位距18,698美元,105,437美元)。在调整分析中,作战受伤人员的总体成本高出30%(1.30;95%置信区间:1.23,1.37)。
这项调查是对作战受伤人员医疗保健利用情况最长时间的连续观察,也是首次评估成本。与在民用部门受伤的人员相比,因作战相关创伤受伤的人员支出高出30%。