Suppr超能文献

绝经后妇女的肥胖问题:评估肥胖和减肥干预效果的最佳人体测量学指标是什么?

Obesity among postmenopausal women: what is the best anthropometric index to assess adiposity and success of weight-loss intervention?

机构信息

Research Centre on Aging, affiliated with CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Faculty of Physical Activity Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Menopause. 2021 Mar 1;28(6):678-685. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001754.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

First, to establish the respective ability of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and relative fat mass index (RFM), to estimate body fat (BF%) measured by DXA (DXA-BF%) and correctly identify postmenopausal women living with obesity (BF% > 35). Second, to identify the best indicator of successful weight-loss intervention in postmenopausal women living with obesity.

METHODS

A total of 277 women (age: 59.8 ± 5.3 y; BF%: 43.4 ± 5.3) from five weight-loss studies with complete data for anthropometric measurements [BMI = weight/height (kg/m2); WC (cm)] and BF% were pooled together. Statistical performance indicators were determined to assess ability of RFM [64-(20 × height/waist circumference) + (12 × sex)], BMI and WC to estimate BF% before and after weight-loss intervention and to correctly identify postmenopausal women living with obesity.

RESULTS

Compared with RFM (r = 0.51; r2 = 0.27; RMSE = 4.4%; Lin's CCC = 0.46) and WC (r = 0.49; r2 = 0.25; RMSE = 4.8%; Lin's CCC = 0.41), BMI (r = 0.73; r2 = 0.52; RMSE = 3.7%; Lin's CCC = 0.71) was the best anthropometric index to estimate DXA-BF% and correctly identify postmenopausal women living with obesity (sensitivity + specificity: BMI = 193; RFM = 152; WC = 158), with lower misclassification error, before weight-loss intervention. After weight-loss, the change in BMI was strongly correlated with change in DXA-BF%, indicating that the BMI is the best indicator of success weight-loss intervention.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of more objective measures of adiposity, BMI is a suitable proxy measure for BF% in postmenopausal women, for whom a lifestyle intervention is relevant. Furthermore, BMI can be used as an indicator to assess success of weight-loss intervention in this subpopulation.

摘要

目的

首先,确定身体质量指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)和相对脂肪质量指数(RFM)各自的能力,以估计双能 X 线吸收法(DXA)测量的体脂肪(DXA-BF%),并正确识别患有肥胖症的绝经后妇女(BF%>35%)。其次,确定肥胖绝经后妇女成功减肥干预的最佳指标。

方法

共有 277 名来自五项减肥研究的女性(年龄:59.8±5.3 岁;BF%:43.4±5.3%),这些研究均具有完整的人体测量数据[BMI=体重/身高(kg/m2);WC(cm)]和 BF%。汇总了这些数据,以确定 RFM[64-(20×身高/腰围)+(12×性别)]、BMI 和 WC 在减肥干预前后估计 BF%的能力,并正确识别患有肥胖症的绝经后妇女。

结果

与 RFM(r=0.51;r2=0.27;RMSE=4.4%;Lin's CCC=0.46)和 WC(r=0.49;r2=0.25;RMSE=4.8%;Lin's CCC=0.41)相比,BMI(r=0.73;r2=0.52;RMSE=3.7%;Lin's CCC=0.71)是估计 DXA-BF%和正确识别患有肥胖症的绝经后妇女的最佳人体测量指标(灵敏度+特异性:BMI=193;RFM=152;WC=158),其分类错误率更低,且在减肥干预前。减肥后,BMI 的变化与 DXA-BF%的变化强烈相关,表明 BMI 是减肥干预成功的最佳指标。

结论

在缺乏更客观的肥胖指标的情况下,BMI 是绝经后妇女 BF%的合适替代指标,对于需要生活方式干预的绝经后妇女,BMI 可作为评估减肥干预效果的指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验