Suppr超能文献

分娩方式与 22 至 23 孕周婴儿存活率的关系。

Association between mode of delivery and infant survival at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH (Drs Czarny, Forde, Rossi, and DeFranco);.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH (Drs Czarny, Forde, Rossi, and DeFranco).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100340. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is currently not recommended before 23 weeks' gestation unless for maternal indications, even in the setting of malpresentation. These recommendations are based on a lack of evidence of improved neonatal outcomes and survival following cesarean delivery and the maternal risks associated with cesarean delivery at this early gestational age. However, as neonatal resuscitative measures and obstetrical interventions improve, studies evaluating the potential neonatal benefit of periviable cesarean delivery have reported inconsistent findings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the survival rates at 1 year of life among resuscitated infants delivered by cesarean delivery with those delivered vaginally at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population-based cohort study of all resuscitated livebirths delivered between 22 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestational age in the United States between 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome was the rate of infant survival at 1 year of life for different routes of delivery (cesarean vs vaginal delivery) at both 22 and 23 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcome variables included infant survival rates for neonates who survived beyond 24 hours of life, neonatal survival, and the length of survival. A secondary analysis also included a comparison of the infant survival rates between the different routes of delivery cohorts stratified by fetal presentation, steroid exposure, and ventilation. Information about composite adverse maternal outcomes were limited to infants who were delivered between 2011 and 2013 (when these items were first reported) and were defined as a requirement for blood transfusion, an unplanned operating room procedure following delivery, unplanned hysterectomy, and intensive care unit admission; the composite adverse maternal outcomes were also compared between the different delivery route cohorts for deliveries occurring between 22 and 23 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between cesarean delivery and infant survival and other neonatal and maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

Resuscitated infants delivered by cesarean delivery had higher rates of survival at 22 weeks (44.9 vs 23.0%; P<.001) and at 23 weeks (53.3 vs 43.4%; P<.001) of gestation regardless of fetal presentation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that infants who were delivered by cesarean delivery at 22 weeks (adjusted relative risk, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.8) and 23 weeks (adjusted relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.5) of gestation were more likely to survive than those delivered vaginally. When the cohort was limited to neonates who survived beyond the first 24 hours of life, vertex neonates born by cesarean delivery were not more likely to survive at 22 weeks (adjusted relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.7) or 23 weeks (adjusted relative risk, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.3) of gestation. An increased risk for composite adverse maternal outcomes (adjusted relative risk, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.7) was associated with cesarean delivery at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery is associated with increased survival at 1 year of life among resuscitated, periviable infants born between 22 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation, especially in the setting of nonvertex presentation. However, cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal morbidity.

摘要

背景

目前,除非存在母体指征,否则不建议在 23 孕周之前行剖宫产,即使胎方位不正也是如此。这些建议是基于缺乏证据表明在这个极早早孕阶段行剖宫产可以改善新生儿结局和存活率,以及与这个极早早孕阶段行剖宫产相关的母体风险。然而,随着新生儿复苏措施和产科干预的改善,评估极早早产儿行剖宫产潜在新生儿获益的研究报告结果并不一致。

目的

本研究旨在比较在 22 孕周和 23 孕周行剖宫产与行阴道分娩的复苏后婴儿在 1 年时的存活率。

研究设计

我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2007 年至 2013 年期间美国所有在 22 0/7 至 23 6/7 孕周出生、复苏后存活的活产儿。主要结局是不同分娩方式(剖宫产与阴道分娩)在 22 周和 23 周时婴儿 1 年时的存活率。次要结局变量包括存活超过 24 小时的新生儿存活率、新生儿存活率和存活时间。二次分析还包括对不同分娩途径队列的婴儿存活率进行比较,按胎儿体位、皮质激素暴露和通气情况进行分层。关于复合不良母体结局的信息仅限于在 2011 年至 2013 年(首次报告这些项目时)分娩的婴儿,定义为需要输血、分娩后计划外手术室手术、计划外子宫切除术和入住重症监护病房;还比较了不同分娩途径队列在 22 至 23 孕周分娩时的复合不良母体结局。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定剖宫产与婴儿存活率及其他新生儿和母体结局之间的关系。

结果

无论胎方位如何,在 22 孕周(44.9%比 23.0%;P<.001)和 23 孕周(53.3%比 43.4%;P<.001)时,行剖宫产分娩的复苏后婴儿的存活率更高。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,在 22 孕周(调整后的相对风险,2.3;95%置信区间,1.9-2.8)和 23 孕周(调整后的相对风险,1.4;95%置信区间,1.2-1.5)时行剖宫产分娩的婴儿比行阴道分娩的婴儿更有可能存活。当队列仅限于存活超过 24 小时的新生儿时,行剖宫产分娩的头位新生儿在 22 孕周(调整后的相对风险,1.2;95%置信区间,0.9-1.7)或 23 孕周(调整后的相对风险,1.1;95%置信区间,0.9-1.3)时的存活率没有更高。复合不良母体结局的风险增加(调整后的相对风险,1.7;95%置信区间,1.1-2.7)与 22 至 23 孕周时的剖宫产相关。

结论

在 22 0/7 至 23 6/7 孕周出生的复苏后极早产儿中,剖宫产与 1 年时的存活率增加有关,尤其是在非头位时。然而,剖宫产与母体发病率增加有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验