• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

读者在编程返回扫视时使用字符信息吗?

Do readers use character information when programming return-sweep saccades?

机构信息

Bournemouth University, Department of Psychology, United Kingdom.

Bournemouth University, Department of Psychology, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2021 Jun;183:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.003
PMID:33652273
Abstract

Reading saccades that occur within a single line of text are guided by the size of letters. However, readers occasionally need to make longer saccades (known as return-sweeps) that take their eyes from the end of one line of text to the beginning of the next. In this study, we tested whether return-sweep saccades are also guided by font size information and whether this guidance depends on visual acuity of the return-sweep target area. To do this, we manipulated the font size of letters (0.29 vs 0.39° per character) and the length of the first line of text (16 vs 26°). The larger font resulted in return-sweeps that landed further to the right of the line start and in a reduction of under-sweeps compared to the smaller font. This suggests that font size information is used when programming return-sweeps. Return-sweeps in the longer line condition landed further to the right of the line start and the proportion of under-sweeps increased compared to the short line condition. This likely reflects an increase in saccadic undershoot error with the increase in intended saccade size. Critically, there was no interaction between font size and line length. This suggests that when programming return-sweeps, the use of font size information does not depend on visual acuity at the saccade target. Instead, it appears that readers rely on global typographic properties of the text in order to maintain an optimal number of characters to the left of their first fixation on a new line.

摘要

阅读单行文本内的眼球跳动由字母大小来引导。然而,读者偶尔需要进行更长的眼球跳动(称为回扫),将眼睛从一行文本的末尾移动到下一行的开头。在这项研究中,我们测试了回扫眼球跳动是否也由字体大小信息引导,以及这种引导是否依赖于回扫目标区域的视力。为此,我们操纵了字母的字体大小(0.29 与 0.39 度/字符)和第一行文本的长度(16 与 26 度)。较大的字体使回扫的落点更偏右,与较小的字体相比,下扫的数量减少。这表明在编程回扫时会使用字体大小信息。在较长的行条件下的回扫落点更偏右,与短行条件相比,下扫的比例增加。这可能反映了随着预期扫视大小的增加,扫视的下冲误差增加。关键的是,字体大小和行长度之间没有相互作用。这表明在编程回扫时,使用字体大小信息不依赖于扫视目标的视力。相反,读者似乎依赖于文本的全局排版属性,以便在新行的第一次注视时保持最佳数量的字符在其左侧。

相似文献

1
Do readers use character information when programming return-sweep saccades?读者在编程返回扫视时使用字符信息吗?
Vision Res. 2021 Jun;183:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.阅读中的回扫眼跳。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1804-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children.成人和儿童阅读过程中的回扫扫视。
Vision Res. 2019 Feb;155:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
4
An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during reading.一项关于阅读过程中回扫目标定位的眼动探索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1197-1203. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01742-3.
5
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.回扫阅读:欠扫注视点加工的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1948-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3.
6
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.拼写能力影响阅读过程中的早期字母编码:来自回扫眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):135-149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949150. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Binocular coordination and return-sweep saccades among skilled adult readers.熟练成年读者的双眼协调与回扫扫视
J Vis. 2019 Jun 3;19(6):10. doi: 10.1167/19.6.10.
8
Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.精神分裂症患者在多行阅读过程中的较低级别眼球运动缺陷:来自返回扫视的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220752. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
9
Column setting and text justification influence return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese multi-line reading.列设置和文本对齐方式影响中文多行阅读过程中的回扫眼动行为。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00559-5.
10
Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading.字体大小在中文阅读中调节扫视目标选择。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):482-90. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0029-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanning.行内注视时长和回扫注视时长之间的差异是由语言、眼动或视觉处理驱动的吗?阅读和Z字符串扫描过程中眼动的比较。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02738-x.
2
A beginner's guide to eye tracking for psycholinguistic studies of reading.阅读心理语言学研究的眼动追踪初学者指南。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):68. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02572-4.
3
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.
眼动追踪基础 第4部分:进行眼动追踪研究的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 6;57(1):46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.
4
Column setting and text justification influence return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese multi-line reading.列设置和文本对齐方式影响中文多行阅读过程中的回扫眼动行为。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00559-5.
5
Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.精神分裂症患者在多行阅读过程中的较低级别眼球运动缺陷:来自返回扫视的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220752. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
6
Word complexity modulates the divided-word effect during Chinese reading.单词复杂度在中文阅读过程中调节拆词效应。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:921056. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921056. eCollection 2022.
7
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.阅读中的回扫眼跳。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1804-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.拼写能力影响阅读过程中的早期字母编码:来自回扫眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):135-149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949150. Epub 2020 Aug 25.