• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人和儿童阅读过程中的回扫扫视。

Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children.

作者信息

Parker Adam J, Slattery Timothy J, Kirkby Julie A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2019 Feb;155:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.007
PMID:30625336
Abstract

During reading, eye movement patterns differ between children and adults. Children make more fixations that are longer in duration and make shorter saccades. Return-sweeps are saccadic eye movements that move a reader's fixation to a new line of text. Return-sweeps move fixation further than intra-line saccades and often undershoot their target. This necessitates a corrective saccade to bring fixation closer to the start of the line. There have been few empirical investigations of return-sweep saccades in adults, and even fewer in children. In the present study, we examined return-sweeps of 47 adults and 48 children who read identical multiline texts. We found that children launch their return-sweeps closer to the end of the line and target a position closer to the left margin. Therefore, children fixate more extreme positions on the screen when reading for comprehension. Furthermore, children required a corrective saccade following a return-sweep more often than adults. Analysis of the duration of the fixation preceding the corrective saccade indicated that children are as efficient as adults at responding to retinal feedback following a saccade. Rather than consider differences in adult's and children's return-sweep behaviour an artefact of oculomotor control, we believe that these differences represent adult's ability to utilise parafoveal processing to encode text at extreme positions.

摘要

在阅读过程中,儿童和成人的眼动模式存在差异。儿童的注视次数更多,持续时间更长,扫视距离更短。回扫是一种将读者的注视点移动到新一行文本的眼跳运动。回扫比行内扫视移动注视点的距离更远,且常常会低于目标位置。这就需要进行一次校正扫视,以使注视点更接近行首。目前针对成人回扫扫视的实证研究较少,针对儿童的研究更少。在本研究中,我们考察了47名成人和48名儿童阅读相同多行文本时的回扫情况。我们发现,儿童发起回扫的位置更靠近行尾,目标位置更靠近左边界。因此,儿童在为理解而阅读时,会在屏幕上注视更极端的位置。此外,儿童在回扫后比成人更频繁地需要进行校正扫视。对校正扫视前注视持续时间的分析表明,儿童在对扫视后的视网膜反馈做出反应方面与成人一样高效。我们认为,成人和儿童回扫行为的差异并非眼动控制的假象,而是成人利用副中央凹加工在极端位置编码文本的能力体现。

相似文献

1
Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children.成人和儿童阅读过程中的回扫扫视。
Vision Res. 2019 Feb;155:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
2
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.回扫阅读:欠扫注视点加工的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1948-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3.
3
Binocular coordination and return-sweep saccades among skilled adult readers.熟练成年读者的双眼协调与回扫扫视
J Vis. 2019 Jun 3;19(6):10. doi: 10.1167/19.6.10.
4
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.拼写能力影响阅读过程中的早期字母编码:来自回扫眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):135-149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949150. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Undersweep fixations during reading in adults and children.成人和儿童阅读时的下扫视固视。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104788. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104788. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.阅读中的回扫眼跳。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1804-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during reading.一项关于阅读过程中回扫目标定位的眼动探索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1197-1203. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01742-3.
8
Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.精神分裂症患者在多行阅读过程中的较低级别眼球运动缺陷:来自返回扫视的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220752. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
9
Column setting and text justification influence return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese multi-line reading.列设置和文本对齐方式影响中文多行阅读过程中的回扫眼动行为。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00559-5.
10
Do readers use character information when programming return-sweep saccades?读者在编程返回扫视时使用字符信息吗?
Vision Res. 2021 Jun;183:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanning.行内注视时长和回扫注视时长之间的差异是由语言、眼动或视觉处理驱动的吗?阅读和Z字符串扫描过程中眼动的比较。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02738-x.
2
Column setting and text justification influence return-sweep eye movement behavior during Chinese multi-line reading.列设置和文本对齐方式影响中文多行阅读过程中的回扫眼动行为。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00559-5.
3
Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.
精神分裂症患者在多行阅读过程中的较低级别眼球运动缺陷:来自返回扫视的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220752. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
Altered eye movements during reading under degraded viewing conditions: Background luminance, text blur, and text contrast.在低质量视觉条件下阅读时的眼动改变:背景亮度、文字模糊和文字对比度。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.4.
5
A novel approach for detection of dyslexia using convolutional neural network with EOG signals.一种使用带眼电图(EOG)信号的卷积神经网络检测阅读障碍的新方法。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Nov;60(11):3041-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02656-3. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.阅读中的回扫眼跳。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1804-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
Algorithms for the automated correction of vertical drift in eye-tracking data.用于眼动追踪数据中垂直漂移自动校正的算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):287-310. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01554-0. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text.阅读障碍者使用不同的视觉采样策略来阅读文本。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84945-9.
9
Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test.视觉固视而非扫视主导了发展性眼动测试。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80870-5.
10
Reconciling print-size and display-size constraints on reading.协调阅读时的打印尺寸和显示尺寸限制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 1;117(48):30276-30284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007514117. Epub 2020 Nov 9.