Jain M K, Rogers J, DeHaas G H
Department of Chemistry, University of Delaware, Newark 19716.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 May 9;940(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90007-7.
The time-course of binding of phospholipase A2 and prophospholipase A2 to vesicles and micelles of a variety of substrate and nonhydrolyzable phospholipid analogs is obtained by monitoring the change in the fluorescence intensity of Trp-3 on the protein or of the 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl (dansyl) chromophore on the surface of the vesicles. The time-dependent increase in the fluorescence intensity of phospholipase A2 is observed only under conditions where catalysis and equilibrium binding are also observed. The overall kinetics of binding is described by two rate constants. A rapid second-order rate constant (ka) for binding of both the proteins is 2.10(7) per s per mol expressed in terms of phospholipids as monomers, and 10(10) per s per mol expressed in terms of vesicles. This is probably a diffusion-limited encounter of the protein with vesicles as the first step in binding. An additional first-order rate constant (kb = 4 per s) was also discerned for the binding of phospholipase A2 but not for prophospholipase A2. The rate of desorption of the bound iphospholipase A2 in the presence of EGTA is very slow (less than 0.0002 per s), whereas the rate of desorption of the bound prophospholipase A2 is much more rapid (2.9 per s). The mechanistic significance of these rate constants is elaborated in terms of the differences in the rates of interfacial catalytic turnover of phospholipase A2 and prophospholipase A2. As shown elsewhere (Jain et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 860, 435-447) the hydrolysis of anionic vesicles by phospholipase A2 occurs in the scooting mode such that the bound enzyme remains on the target vesicles for several thousand catalytic turnover cycles. On the other hand, as shown in this paper, the kinetics of hydrolysis by prophospholipase A2 is dominated by its intervesicle exchange. Therefore, interfacial catalysis by prophospholipase A2 in the hopping mode would involve an on- and an off-step in each cycle, resulting in a catalytic turnover number of about 1.2 per s. A change from the hopping to the scooting mode of catalysis thus provides the kinetic basis for activation of interfacial catalysis by phospholipase A2 compared to that for prophospholipase A2.
通过监测蛋白质上色氨酸-3或囊泡表面5-二甲基氨基萘-1-磺酰基(丹磺酰)发色团的荧光强度变化,获得磷脂酶A2和前磷脂酶A2与多种底物和不可水解磷脂类似物的囊泡和微团结合的时间进程。仅在观察到催化作用和平衡结合的条件下,才观察到磷脂酶A2荧光强度随时间的增加。结合的总体动力学由两个速率常数描述。两种蛋白质结合的快速二级速率常数(ka),以磷脂单体计为每秒每摩尔2.10(7),以囊泡计为每秒每摩尔10(10)。这可能是蛋白质与囊泡的扩散限制碰撞,是结合的第一步。还发现磷脂酶A2结合有一个额外的一级速率常数(kb = 4每秒),但前磷脂酶A2没有。在EGTA存在下,结合的磷脂酶A2的解吸速率非常慢(每秒小于0.0002),而结合的前磷脂酶A2的解吸速率要快得多(每秒2.9)。根据磷脂酶A2和前磷脂酶A2界面催化周转速率的差异,阐述了这些速率常数的机制意义。如其他地方所示(Jain等人,《生物化学与生物物理学报》860, 435 - 447),磷脂酶A2对阴离子囊泡的水解以滑动模式发生,使得结合的酶在靶囊泡上停留数千个催化周转循环。另一方面,如本文所示,前磷脂酶A2的水解动力学主要由其囊泡间交换决定。因此,前磷脂酶A2在跳跃模式下的界面催化在每个循环中都涉及一个结合和一个解离步骤,导致催化周转数约为每秒1.2。与前磷脂酶A2相比,催化模式从跳跃变为滑动为磷脂酶A2界面催化的激活提供了动力学基础。