• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
NIH Funding, Research Productivity, and Scientific Impact: a 20-Year Study.NIH 资助、研究生产力和科学影响力:一项 20 年的研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):104-109. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06659-y. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants.美国国立心肺血液研究所资助的心血管 R01 资助项目的大队列的百分位排名和引文影响力。
Circ Res. 2014 Feb 14;114(4):600-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302656. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
3
Fewer Than One in 20 Current Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons Have Obtained National Institutes of Health Funding.当前,不到 1/20 的学术型骨科医生获得过美国国立卫生研究院的资助。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1265-1272. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002556. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Achieve High Rates of K Award Conversion Into R01 Funding.心胸血管外科医生实现了 K 奖转化为 R01 资助的高成功率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
5
Career Research Performance Among Radiology Early Career Grant Recipients Compared With National Institutes of Health K Award Recipients.放射科早期职业资助获得者与美国国立卫生研究院 K 奖获得者的职业研究绩效比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Sep;19(9):1042-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 May 28.
6
A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.美国医学院麻醉学研究中近期美国国立卫生研究院资助的十年分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):1844-1855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants.美国国立心肺血液研究所心血管疾病R01基金先前的发表产出、资助百分位排名及主题标准化引文影响力
Circ Res. 2014 Sep 12;115(7):617-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304766.
8
Success in Attaining Independent Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees in Ophthalmology: An Extended Follow-up.在眼科 NIH K 补助金获得者中获得独立资助的成功:延长随访。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1335-1340. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3887.
9
National Institutes of Health R01 Grant Funding Is Associated With Enhanced Research Productivity and Career Advancement Among Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.美国国立卫生研究院 R01 资助与学术心胸外科医生增强的研究生产力和职业发展相关。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Winter;33(4):1047-1056. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Scholarly activity following National Institutes of Health Women's Reproductive Health Research K12 training-a cohort study.美国国立卫生研究院女性生殖健康研究 K12 培训项目后的学术活动——一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):425.e1-425.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.050. Epub 2023 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Three decades of neuroscience research using animal models of ADHD and ASD: a bibliometric analysis.三十年使用注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)动物模型的神经科学研究:一项文献计量分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;16:1528205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1528205. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and implementation of digital solutions in healthcare: insights from the Australian tertiary hospital landscape.医疗保健领域数字解决方案的开发与实施:来自澳大利亚三级医院的见解
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 14;7:1543225. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1543225. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing the quality of studies funded by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research, 2010-2020.评估2010 - 2020年以色列国家卫生政策研究所资助研究的质量。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 5;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w.
4
NIH funding for the pediatric surgeon-scientist: An analysis of current trends.美国国立卫生研究院对儿科外科医生-科学家的资助:当前趋势分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Dec 31;23:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.005. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact.再探科学精英:生产力、合作、署名及影响力模式
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Apr;17(165):20200135. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0135. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Science of science.科学学。
Science. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185.
3
Impact fact-or fiction?影响——事实还是虚构?
EMBO J. 2013 Jun 12;32(12):1651-2. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.126. Epub 2013 May 17.
4
Does the H index have predictive power?H指数具有预测能力吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707962104. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
5
H-index: however ranked, citations need context.H指数:无论如何排名,引用都需要背景信息。
Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):403. doi: 10.1038/449403b.
6
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.一个用于量化个人科研产出的指标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
7
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.美国国立卫生研究院对临床研究资助申请的同行评审。
JAMA. 2004 Feb 18;291(7):836-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.7.836.

NIH 资助、研究生产力和科学影响力:一项 20 年的研究。

NIH Funding, Research Productivity, and Scientific Impact: a 20-Year Study.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1481 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):104-109. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06659-y. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-06659-y
PMID:33655385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8738817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Research Project Grant (R01) is the oldest grant mechanism used by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Receiving an R01 award is often taken as a sign of scientific success. We presented normative data on multiple productivity and impact metrics for a more objective assessment of funded grants' scientific success.

METHODS

All initial R01 grants awarded by NIH in the year 2000 were prospectively followed and evaluated using the numbers of publications and citations, as well as the h-indices at the grant level. We examined the variability, time trends, and relations among these metrics to better understand the funded projects' cumulative output and impact.

RESULTS

In the 20 years since initial funding, 4451 R01 grants generated a total of 55,053 publications. These publications were cumulatively cited 3,705,553 times over 736,811 citation years. The median number of publications was 8 (25, 75 percentiles 4, 17) per grant for the entire 20-year duration. The median number of citations and the median h-index were 441 (25, 75 percentiles 156, 1061) and 7 (25, 75 percentiles 4, 13) per grant, respectively. The time courses of publication, citation, and accumulation of h-index were highly variable among the awarded grants. Although the metrics were correlated within an award, they reflected the grant's success in different domains.

CONCLUSION

Numbers of publications, citations, and h-indices vary greatly among funded R01 grants. When used together, these metrics provide a more complete picture of the productivity and long-term impact of a funded grant.

摘要

背景

研究项目资助(R01)是美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)使用的最古老的资助机制。获得 R01 资助通常被视为科学成功的标志。我们提出了多项生产力和影响力指标的规范数据,以便更客观地评估资助项目的科学成功。

方法

前瞻性地跟踪和评估 2000 年 NIH 授予的所有初始 R01 资助,并使用出版物数量和引文以及资助级别上的 h 指数进行评估。我们研究了这些指标的可变性、时间趋势和关系,以更好地了解资助项目的累积产出和影响。

结果

在初始资助后的 20 年中,4451 项 R01 资助共产生了 55053 篇出版物。这些出版物在 736811 个引文年中被累计引用了 3705533 次。在整个 20 年期间,每项资助的平均出版物数量中位数为 8 篇(25%、75%分位数为 4、17)。平均引文数和平均 h 指数中位数分别为 441 篇(25%、75%分位数为 156、1061)和 7 篇(25%、75%分位数为 4、13)。授予的资助中,出版物、引文和 h 指数的积累时间过程高度可变。尽管这些指标在一项资助内相关,但它们反映了资助在不同领域的成功。

结论

受资助的 R01 资助的出版物数量、引文和 h 指数差异很大。当一起使用时,这些指标提供了资助项目生产力和长期影响的更完整图景。