Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (SP) Brasil.
Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgique.
J Bras Pneumol. 2021 Feb 24;47(3):e20200378. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200378. eCollection 2021.
Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves survival of patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen has been associated with a significant risk of clinically relevant toxicity. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of AC for NSCLC patients in a real-world setting.
This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with stage I-III NSCLC undergoing surgery with curative intent between 2009 and 2018. AC was administered at the discretion of physicians. The patients were divided into two groups: AC group and no AC (control) group. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as the safety profile and feasibility of the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen in a real-world setting.
The study involved 231 patients, 80 of whom received AC. Of those, 55 patients received the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen. Survival analyses stratified by tumor stage showed that patients with stage II NSCLC in the AC group had better RFS (p = 0.036) and OS (p = 0.017) than did those in the no AC group. Among patients with stage III NSCLC in the AC group, RFS was better (p < 0.001) and there was a trend toward improved OS (p = 0.060) in comparison with controls. Of those who received the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen, 29% had grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia, and 9% died of toxicity.
These results support the benefit of AC for NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. However, because the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen was associated with alarming rates of toxicity, more effective and less toxic alternatives should be investigated.
辅助化疗(AC)可提高可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率。然而,顺铂-长春瑞滨方案与严重的临床相关毒性风险相关。我们旨在评估在真实环境中 AC 对 NSCLC 患者的有效性、安全性和可行性。
这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年至 2018 年间接受根治性手术治疗的 I-III 期 NSCLC 患者。AC 由医生决定是否使用。患者分为 AC 组和无 AC(对照组)组。研究结果包括总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS),以及顺铂-长春瑞滨方案在真实环境中的安全性和可行性。
研究共纳入 231 例患者,其中 80 例接受了 AC。其中,55 例患者接受了顺铂-长春瑞滨方案。根据肿瘤分期进行的生存分析显示,AC 组 II 期 NSCLC 患者的 RFS(p=0.036)和 OS(p=0.017)均优于对照组。在 AC 组 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,RFS 更好(p<0.001),且 OS 有改善趋势(p=0.060)。接受顺铂-长春瑞滨方案的患者中,有 29%发生了 3-4 级发热性中性粒细胞减少症,有 9%的患者死于毒性。
这些结果支持在真实环境中对 NSCLC 患者进行 AC 的获益。然而,由于顺铂-长春瑞滨方案与令人担忧的毒性发生率相关,应该探索更有效和毒性更低的替代方案。