Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Apr 1;157(4):413-420. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5844.
The emerging paradigm of treat-to-target in psoriasis requires accurate monitoring of treatment response. The commonly used physician global assessment tool does not capture the patient's perception of their disease. Patient assessments facilitate shared decision-making and foster patient-centered care; however, recent research reports a discordance between patient- and physician-reported psoriasis severity. Understanding the factors underlying this discordance may improve treatment satisfaction and disease outcomes.
To evaluate the discordance between patient- and physician-reported measures of psoriasis severity and assess the association with patient mental health status.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort study using repeated cross-sectional analysis of real-world longitudinal data was conducted at a large specialist psoriasis service serving London and Southeast England. A total of 502 patients attending the psoriasis service between May 12, 2016, and November 1, 2018, were included. Data analysis was conducted July 22 to October 22, 2019.
Psoriasis severity was assessed on each visit with identical 5-point physician and patient global assessment scales (clear/nearly clear, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe). Each patient completed validated self-report screens for depression and anxiety on each visit.
Longitudinal data from 502 individuals with psoriasis (1985 total observations) were available. A total of 339 patients (68%) were men, 396 (79%) were White, mean (SD) age was 47 (13) years, and 197 patients (39%) had concurrent psoriatic arthritis, 43 (9%) screened positive for depression, and 49 (10%) screened positive for anxiety. There was discordance between physician and patient measures of disease severity in 768 of 1985 office appointments (39%); on 511 visits (26%) patients rated their psoriasis as less severe and on 257 visits (13%) patients rated their psoriasis as more severe compared with their physician. Individuals who screened positive for depression or anxiety were more likely to overestimate their psoriasis severity compared with their physician (relative risk ratio: depression, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5; anxiety, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4). These findings remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, smoking, number of comorbidities, treatment modality, and presence of psoriatic arthritis.
The findings of this cohort study suggest that discordance between patient and physician assessments of psoriasis severity is associated with patients' mental health status. Recognition of anxiety and depression in individuals with psoriasis appears to be important when interpreting patient-reported outcome measures and informing appropriate treatment decisions.
银屑病的靶向治疗新兴模式需要准确监测治疗反应。常用的医生总体评估工具无法捕捉到患者对疾病的感知。患者评估有助于共同决策,并促进以患者为中心的护理;然而,最近的研究报告称,患者和医生报告的银屑病严重程度存在差异。了解这种差异的根本原因可能会提高治疗满意度和疾病结果。
评估患者和医生报告的银屑病严重程度测量之间的差异,并评估与患者心理健康状况的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项队列研究,使用真实世界纵向数据的重复横断面分析,在一家为伦敦和英格兰东南部服务的大型专科银屑病服务机构进行。共纳入 2016 年 5 月 12 日至 2018 年 11 月 1 日期间在银屑病服务机构就诊的 502 例患者。数据分析于 2019 年 7 月 22 日至 10 月 22 日进行。
每次就诊时,使用相同的 5 分制医生和患者总体评估量表(清除/几乎清除、轻度、中度、重度和非常重度)评估银屑病严重程度。每位患者在每次就诊时都完成了经过验证的抑郁和焦虑自我报告筛查。
502 名银屑病患者(共 1985 次就诊)的纵向数据可用。共有 339 名患者(68%)为男性,396 名(79%)为白人,平均(SD)年龄为 47(13)岁,197 名患者(39%)患有银屑病关节炎,43 名(9%)筛查出抑郁症,49 名(10%)筛查出焦虑症。在 1985 次就诊中,有 768 次(39%)出现医生和患者对疾病严重程度的评估存在差异;在 511 次就诊(26%)中,患者认为自己的银屑病较轻,而在 257 次就诊(13%)中,患者认为自己的银屑病较严重与他们的医生。与医生相比,筛查出患有抑郁症或焦虑症的个体更有可能高估自己的银屑病严重程度(相对风险比:抑郁症,2.7;95%CI,1.6-4.5;焦虑症,2.1;95%CI,1.3-3.4)。这些发现在调整年龄、种族、性别、体重指数、吸烟、合并症数量、治疗方式和存在银屑病关节炎后仍然具有统计学意义。
这项队列研究的结果表明,患者和医生对银屑病严重程度的评估之间存在差异与患者的心理健康状况有关。在解释患者报告的结果测量并为适当的治疗决策提供信息时,识别银屑病患者的焦虑和抑郁似乎很重要。