Suppr超能文献

长期使用抗高血压药物与主动脉夹层患者晚期结局的关系。

Association of Long-term Use of Antihypertensive Medications With Late Outcomes Among Patients With Aortic Dissection.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e210469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0469.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The associations between long-term treatment of aortic dissection with various medications and late patient outcomes are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To compare late outcomes after long-term use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or other antihypertensive medications (controls) among patients treated for aortic dissection.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan included 6978 adult patients with a first-ever aortic dissection who survived to hospital discharge during the period between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, and who received during the first 90 days after discharge a prescription for an ACEI, ARB, β-blocker, or at least 1 other antihypertensive medication. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2020.

EXPOSURE

Long-term use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs, with use of other antihypertensive medications as a control.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic aneurism or dissection, later aortic operation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, hospital readmission, and new-onset dialysis.

RESULTS

Of 6978 total participants, 3492 received a β-blocker, 1729 received an ACEI or ARB, and 1757 received another antihypertension drug. Compared with patients in the other 2 groups, those in the β-blocker group were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [13.9] years vs 68.7 [13.5] years for ACEIs or ARBs and 69.9 [13.8] years for controls) and comprised more male patients (2520 [72.2%] vs 1161 [67.1%] for ACEIs or ARBs and 1224 [69.7%] for controls). The prevalence of medicated hypertension was highest in the ACEI or ARB group (1039 patients [60.1%]), followed by the control group (896 patients [51.0%]), and was lowest in the β-blocker group (1577 patients [45.2%]). Patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection were more likely to be prescribed β-blockers (1134 patients [32.5%]) than an ACEI or ARB (309 patients [17.9%]) or another antihypertension medication (376 patients [21.4%]). After adjusting for multiple propensity scores, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics among the 3 groups. No differences in the risks for all outcomes were observed between the ACEI or ARB and β-blocker groups. The risk of all-cause hospital readmission was significantly lower in the ACEI or ARB group (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.997) and β-blocker group (subdistribution HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94) than in the control group. Moreover, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI or ARB group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and the β-blocker group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) than in the control group. In addition, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ARB group than in the ACEI group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with benefits in the long-term treatment of aortic dissection.

摘要

重要性

长期使用各种药物治疗主动脉夹层与晚期患者结局之间的关系尚未完全明确。

目的

比较长期使用β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)或其他降压药物(对照组)治疗主动脉夹层患者的晚期结局。

设计、地点和参与者:本基于人群的回顾性队列研究使用了台湾全民健康保险研究数据库,纳入了 6978 名首次出现主动脉夹层且在 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间存活至出院的成年患者,并且在出院后 90 天内接受了 ACEI、ARB、β受体阻滞剂或至少 1 种其他降压药物的处方。数据分析于 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月进行。

暴露

长期使用β受体阻滞剂、ACEI 或 ARB,以使用其他降压药物作为对照。

主要结局和测量指标

主要研究结果是全因死亡率、因主动脉瘤或夹层导致的死亡、后期主动脉手术、主要心脏和脑血管不良事件、医院再入院和新发透析。

结果

在 6978 名总参与者中,3492 名接受了β受体阻滞剂,1729 名接受了 ACEI 或 ARB,1757 名接受了其他降压药物。与其他 2 组相比,β受体阻滞剂组患者年龄更小(平均[标准差]年龄,62.1[13.9]岁比 ACEI 或 ARB 组的 68.7[13.5]岁和对照组的 69.9[13.8]岁),且男性患者更多(2520[72.2%]比 ACEI 或 ARB 组的 1161[67.1%]和对照组的 1224[69.7%])。ACEI 或 ARB 组的药物治疗高血压患病率最高(1039 例[60.1%]),其次是对照组(896 例[51.0%]),β受体阻滞剂组最低(1577 例[45.2%])。接受 A 型主动脉夹层手术的患者更有可能被开β受体阻滞剂(1134 例[32.5%]),而不是 ACEI 或 ARB(309 例[17.9%])或其他降压药物(376 例[21.4%])。在调整了多个倾向评分后,3 组之间的临床特征没有显著差异。ACEI 或 ARB 组与β受体阻滞剂组之间观察到的所有结局风险没有差异。ACEI 或 ARB 组(亚分布危险比[HR],0.92;95%置信区间,0.84-0.997)和β受体阻滞剂组(亚分布 HR,0.87;95%置信区间,0.81-0.94)的全因住院再入院风险显著低于对照组。此外,ACEI 或 ARB 组(HR,0.79;95%置信区间,0.71-0.89)和β受体阻滞剂组(HR,0.82;95%置信区间,0.73-0.91)的全因死亡率风险低于对照组。此外,ARB 组的全因死亡率风险低于 ACEI 组(HR,0.85;95%置信区间,0.76-0.95)。

结论和相关性

β受体阻滞剂、ACEI 或 ARB 的使用与主动脉夹层的长期治疗有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5229/7930924/ad95211fdd94/jamanetwopen-e210469-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验