Graf S, Kranz J, Schmidt S, Bellut L, Uhlig A
Klinik für Urologie und Andrologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4020, Linz, Österreich.
UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2021 Apr;60(4):434-443. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01476-x. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
This manuscript outlines various types of review articles as forms of evidence synthesis with special regard to their strengths and limitations. Review articles not only present summarised data, but also offer an evaluation of the quality of the individual studies included in it. The validity and the reliability of outcomes of reviews is strongly dependent on the quality of the data included. For this reason, a comprehensive literature selection process is paramount. Fundamental knowledge of bias and literature assessment is also necessary when reading reviews. This article presents selected tools for evidence appraisal and evaluation of bias risk.
本手稿概述了各类综述文章,将其作为证据综合的形式,并特别关注其优势和局限性。综述文章不仅呈现汇总数据,还对其中包含的各个研究的质量进行评估。综述结果的有效性和可靠性在很大程度上取决于所纳入数据的质量。因此,全面的文献筛选过程至关重要。阅读综述时,对偏倚和文献评估的基本知识也是必要的。本文介绍了用于证据评估和偏倚风险评估的选定工具。