• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少调查中堕胎漏报:在马拉维和塞内加尔两次运用清单实验法的测试结果。

Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.

机构信息

Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, United States of America.

Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247201. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247201
PMID:33657126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7928519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately measuring abortion incidence poses many challenges. The list experiment is a method designed to increase the reporting of sensitive or stigmatized behaviors in surveys, but has only recently been applied to the measurement of abortion. To further test the utility of the list experiment for measuring abortion incidence, we conducted list experiments in two countries, over two time periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The list experiment is an indirect method of measuring sensitive experiences that protects respondent confidentiality by hiding individual responses to a binary sensitive item (i.e., abortion) by combining this response with answers to other non-sensitive binary control items. Respondents report the number of list items that apply to them, not which ones. We conducted a list experiment to measure cumulative lifetime incidence of abortion in Malawi, and separately to measure cumulative five-year incidence of abortion in Senegal, among cisgender women of reproductive age.

RESULTS

Among 810 eligible respondents in Malawi, list experiment results estimated a cumulative lifetime incidence of abortion of 0.9% (95%CI: 0.0, 7.6). Among 1016 eligible respondents in Senegal, list experiment estimates indicated a cumulative five-year incidence of abortion of 2.8% (95%CI: 0.0, 10.4) which, while lower than anticipated, is seven times the proportion estimated from a direct question on abortion (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Two test applications of the list experiment to measure abortion experiences in Malawi and Senegal likely underestimated abortion incidence. Future efforts should include context-specific formative qualitative research for the development and selection of list items, enumerator training, and method delivery to assess if and how these changes can improve method performance.

摘要

背景

准确测量堕胎发生率面临诸多挑战。列表实验是一种旨在增加对调查中敏感或污名化行为报告的方法,但最近才被应用于堕胎的测量。为了进一步测试列表实验在测量堕胎发生率方面的效用,我们在两个国家、两个时间段进行了列表实验。

材料与方法

列表实验是一种间接测量敏感体验的方法,通过将对二项敏感项(即堕胎)的个人回答与其他非敏感二项控制项的回答结合起来,保护受访者的机密性,从而隐藏对该敏感项的单独回答。受访者报告适用于他们的列表项的数量,而不是报告哪些项。我们进行了一项列表实验,以衡量马拉维育龄女性的累积终身堕胎发生率,并分别衡量塞内加尔育龄女性的累积五年堕胎发生率。

结果

在马拉维的 810 名符合条件的受访者中,列表实验结果估计累积终身堕胎发生率为 0.9%(95%CI:0.0,7.6)。在塞内加尔的 1016 名符合条件的受访者中,列表实验估计表明,累积五年堕胎发生率为 2.8%(95%CI:0.0,10.4),虽然低于预期,但却是直接询问堕胎问题(0.4%)估计比例的七倍。

结论

列表实验在马拉维和塞内加尔两次测试应用中可能低估了堕胎发生率。未来的工作应包括针对列表项的开发和选择进行特定于背景的定性研究、对普查员进行培训以及方法实施,以评估这些变化是否以及如何可以提高方法的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cea/7928519/17d1a894f078/pone.0247201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cea/7928519/d6cd4452f2fc/pone.0247201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cea/7928519/17d1a894f078/pone.0247201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cea/7928519/d6cd4452f2fc/pone.0247201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cea/7928519/17d1a894f078/pone.0247201.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.减少调查中堕胎漏报:在马拉维和塞内加尔两次运用清单实验法的测试结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247201. eCollection 2021.
2
Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.减少耻辱化妊娠结局漏报:使用名单实验法对德克萨斯州自主堕胎进行混合方法研究的结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0812-4.
3
Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the List Experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia.利用列表实验减少对受污名化健康事件的漏报:利比里亚一项基于人群的堕胎随机研究结果
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1951-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv174.
4
Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.俄亥俄州妇女直接调查问题与列表实验得出的堕胎发生率估计值比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269476. eCollection 2022.
5
An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.一种应用于巴基斯坦卡拉奇的列表实验来估计堕胎率的方法。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 14;46(Suppl 1):13-24. doi: 10.1363/46e0520.
6
Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.关于堕胎的列表实验数据的多变量回归分析:来自利比里亚一项大型随机抽样人群研究的结果。
Popul Health Metr. 2017 Dec 21;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x.
7
Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.估算堕胎发生率的新方法。
Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 18;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0702-0.
8
Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey.通过家庭调查估计坦桑尼亚东北部社区人工流产的终身发生率并了解其堕胎做法。
Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?列表实验能否提高堕胎测量的有效性?
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Mar;50(1):43-61. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12082. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining the list-experiment and direct question to improve estimation of abortion incidence.结合列表实验和直接提问以改进人工流产发生率的估计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaf185.
2
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题:美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Implementation of preconception care for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural and tribal areas of Nashik District, India.

本文引用的文献

1
An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.一种应用于巴基斯坦卡拉奇的列表实验来估计堕胎率的方法。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 14;46(Suppl 1):13-24. doi: 10.1363/46e0520.
2
Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey.通过家庭调查估计坦桑尼亚东北部社区人工流产的终身发生率并了解其堕胎做法。
Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey.
印度纳西克区农村和部落地区实施孕前保健以预防不良妊娠结局
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 9;43:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102796. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Pregnancy and pregnancy intention after experiencing infertility: A longitudinal study of women in Malawi.经历不孕后怀孕及怀孕意愿:马拉维女性的纵向研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;3(11):e0001646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001646. eCollection 2023.
5
Trading HIV for sheep: Risky sexual behavior and the response of female sex workers to Tabaski in Senegal.用艾滋病毒换羊:塞内加尔的女性性工作者在塔巴斯基节期间的危险性行为及其应对措施。
Health Econ. 2024 Jan;33(1):153-193. doi: 10.1002/hec.4756. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.俄亥俄州妇女直接调查问题与列表实验得出的堕胎发生率估计值比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269476. eCollection 2022.
7
Estimating Prevalence of Abortion Using List Experiments: Findings from a Survey of Women in Delaware and Maryland.使用列表实验估计堕胎的流行率:来自特拉华州和马里兰州妇女调查的结果。
Womens Health Issues. 2022 Jan-Feb;32(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
估算堕胎率并了解社区领袖和医疗服务提供者的观点:土耳其伊斯坦布尔一项混合方法研究的结果
Womens Health (Lond). 2020 Jan-Dec;16:1745506520953353. doi: 10.1177/1745506520953353.
4
Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys.美国的堕胎报告:三项国家生育调查评估。
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):899-925. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4.
5
Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review. 自我管理的堕胎:系统范围界定综述。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:87-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Infanticide in Senegal: results from an exploratory mixed-methods study.塞内加尔的杀婴行为:一项探索性混合方法研究的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1624116. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1624116.
7
Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.减少耻辱化妊娠结局漏报:使用名单实验法对德克萨斯州自主堕胎进行混合方法研究的结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0812-4.
8
Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?列表实验能否提高堕胎测量的有效性?
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Mar;50(1):43-61. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12082. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Prevalence of Induced Abortion in Iran: A Comparison of Two Indirect Estimation Techniques.伊朗人工流产的流行率:两种间接估计技术的比较。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 1;44(2):73-79. doi: 10.1363/44e6218.
10
Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.关于堕胎的列表实验数据的多变量回归分析:来自利比里亚一项大型随机抽样人群研究的结果。
Popul Health Metr. 2017 Dec 21;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0157-x.