• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅骨厚度和电导率对非侵入性注射电流传播的影响。

Effect of skull thickness and conductivity on current propagation for noninvasively injected currents.

机构信息

Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.

出版信息

J Neural Eng. 2021 May 4;18(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abebc3.

DOI:10.1088/1741-2552/abebc3
PMID:33657542
Abstract

When currents are injected into the scalp, e.g. during transcranial current stimulation, the resulting currents generated in the brain are substantially affected by the changes in conductivity and geometry of intermediate tissue. In this work, we introduce the concept of 'skull-transparent' currents, for which the changing conductivity does not significantly alter the field while propagating through the head.We establish transfer functions relating scalp currents to head potentials in accepted simplified models of the head, and find approximations for which skull-transparency holds. The current fields resulting from specified current patterns are calculated in multiple head models, including MRI heads and compared with homogeneous heads to characterize the transparency. Experimental validation is performed by measuring the current field in head phantoms.The main theoretical result is derived from observing that at high spatial frequencies, in the transfer function relating currents injected into the scalp to potential generated inside the head, the conductivity terms form a multiplicative factor and do not otherwise influence the transfer function. This observation is utilized to design injected current waveforms that maintain nearly identical focusing patterns independently of the changes in skull conductivity and thickness for a wide range of conductivity and thickness values in an idealized spherical head model as well as in a realistic MRI-based head model. Experimental measurements of the current field in an agar-based head phantom confirm the transparency of these patterns.Our results suggest the possibility that well-chosen patterns of current injection result in precise focusing inside the brain even withoutknowledge of exact conductivities of intermediate layers.

摘要

当电流注入头皮时,例如在经颅电流刺激期间,大脑中产生的电流会受到中间组织电导率和几何形状变化的极大影响。在这项工作中,我们引入了“颅骨透明”电流的概念,对于这种电流,在通过头部传播时,电导率的变化不会显著改变电场。我们建立了头皮电流与头部电位之间的传递函数,这些传递函数适用于头部简化模型,并找到了保持颅骨透明性的近似值。在多个头部模型中计算了指定电流模式产生的电流场,包括 MRI 头部,并与均匀头部进行比较,以表征透明度。通过在头部体模中测量电流场来进行实验验证。主要的理论结果源于观察到,在高空间频率下,在将头皮注入电流与头部内部产生的电位相关联的传递函数中,电导率项形成一个乘法因子,而不会以其他方式影响传递函数。这一观察结果被用于设计注入电流波形,这些波形在理想球形头部模型以及基于 MRI 的实际头部模型中,在广泛的电导率和厚度范围内,保持几乎相同的聚焦模式,而与颅骨电导率和厚度的变化无关。在基于琼脂的头部体模中测量电流场的实验证实了这些模式的透明性。我们的结果表明,即使不知道中间层的确切电导率,选择合适的电流注入模式也有可能实现大脑内部的精确聚焦。

相似文献

1
Effect of skull thickness and conductivity on current propagation for noninvasively injected currents.颅骨厚度和电导率对非侵入性注射电流传播的影响。
J Neural Eng. 2021 May 4;18(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/abebc3.
2
Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.采用优化的电阻抗断层成像-脑电图技术在体测定头部电导率频率响应。
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:484-495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
3
Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.校准现实人头模型中颅骨电导率和厚度的跨被试变异性。
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117353. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117353. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)测量对组织电导率的敏感性。
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Mar 7;49(5):701-17. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/5/004.
5
Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.头部组织电导率的不确定性和复杂性对新生儿脑电图正向建模的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Oct;37(10):3604-22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23263. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.头皮新生儿脑电图为局灶性,这意味着在现实新生儿头部模型中,颅骨的电导率较高。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
7
Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.颅骨建模效应对基于参数式电阻抗断层成像的电导率估计的影响。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Aug;65(8):1785-1797. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2777143. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.参与者的年龄是否会影响 tDCS 诱导的电场?来自计算模拟的见解。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021 Jun 7;7(4). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac0547.
9
Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.用于使用磁共振成像进行低频电导率和电流密度成像的软件工具箱。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Nov;64(11):2505-2514. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2732502.
10
A novel bounded EIT protocol to generate inhomogeneous skull conductivity maps non-invasively.一种新型的有界电阻抗断层成像(EIT)协议,用于无创生成不均匀的颅骨电导率图。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:1440-1443. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175254.

引用本文的文献

1
Cell-specific effects of temporal interference stimulation on cortical function.时程干扰刺激对皮质功能的细胞特异性影响。
Commun Biol. 2024 Sep 2;7(1):1076. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06728-y.
2
Understanding the effects of cortical gyrification in tACS: insights from experiments and computational models.了解经颅交流电刺激中皮质脑回形成的影响:来自实验和计算模型的见解。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 16;17:1223950. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1223950. eCollection 2023.
3
Focused Epicranial Brain Stimulation by Spatial Sculpting of Pulsed Electric Fields Using High Density Electrode Arrays.
聚焦经颅脑刺激:利用高密度电极阵列对脉冲电场进行空间整形。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Jul;10(20):e2207251. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207251. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Using different methods for calculating frontal alpha asymmetry to study its development from infancy to 3 years of age in a large longitudinal sample.使用不同的方法来计算额侧α不对称性,以在一个大的纵向样本中研究其从婴儿期到 3 岁的发展情况。
Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Sep;63(6):e22163. doi: 10.1002/dev.22163. Epub 2021 Jul 22.