Department of Health Services Policy and Management (Hung, Shih, Crouch), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Brown), and Rural and Minority Health Research Center (Hung, Brown, Crouch), University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia.
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Sep 1;72(9):998-1005. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000203. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
This study aimed to examine whether facility ownership (public, private nonprofit, private for-profit ownership) was associated with provision of suicide prevention programs.
A retrospective cross-sectional study identified self-reported suicide prevention program status across 7,597 mental health facilities with outpatient settings by using data from the 2019 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator. Multivariable logistic regression models examined whether facility ownership was associated with availability of these programs.
In 2019, only 61.2% of facilities provided outpatient suicide prevention programs. Higher odds of program provision were associated with public ownership (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.37-1.97, p<0.001), facilities serving young adults (AOR=2.16, 95% CI=1.66-2.82, p<0.001) or serving seniors (AOR=1.44, 95% CI=1.27-1.63, p<0.001), and facilities accepting Medicare (AOR=1.34, 95% CI=1.16-1.53, p<0.001), compared with their counterparts, with significant differences across facility ownership types by rurality of locations. Facilities accepting uninsured patients (AOR=0.81, 95% CI=0.68-0.98, p=0.027) or Medicaid patients (AOR=0.76, 95% CI=0.62-0.92, p=0.006) had lower odds of providing these programs.
Facility ownership contributed to significantly different decisions on provision of outpatient suicide prevention programs. Maldistribution of these services should raise concerns, given nationwide efforts to prevent suicide and weak ownership regulations for mental health facilities. Understanding barriers and facilitators for deployment of these programs may improve access to suicide prevention services for all, especially for eligible patients in rural areas.
本研究旨在探讨医疗机构所有权(公立、非营利私立、营利私立)是否与预防自杀项目的提供有关。
一项回顾性横断面研究通过使用 2019 年物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局行为健康治疗服务定位器的数据,确定了 7597 家具有门诊设置的心理健康设施提供自我报告的预防自杀项目的情况。多变量逻辑回归模型检验了医疗机构所有权是否与这些项目的提供有关。
2019 年,只有 61.2%的设施提供门诊预防自杀项目。更高的项目提供概率与公有制(调整后优势比[OR]=1.64,95%置信区间[CI]=1.37-1.97,p<0.001)、为年轻人服务的设施(OR=2.16,95%CI=1.66-2.82,p<0.001)或为老年人服务的设施(OR=1.44,95%CI=1.27-1.63,p<0.001)以及接受医疗保险的设施(OR=1.34,95%CI=1.16-1.53,p<0.001)相关,与设施所有权类型相比,农村地区的差异显著。接受无保险患者(OR=0.81,95%CI=0.68-0.98,p=0.027)或医疗补助患者(OR=0.76,95%CI=0.62-0.92,p=0.006)的设施提供这些项目的可能性较低。
医疗机构所有权对门诊预防自杀项目的提供做出了显著不同的决策。鉴于全国范围内预防自杀的努力以及对心理健康设施所有权的薄弱监管,这些服务的分配不均应引起关注。了解这些项目部署的障碍和促进因素可能会改善所有人获得预防自杀服务的机会,特别是农村地区符合条件的患者。