• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子咨询专家回复质量量表(eSQUARE):一种通过电子咨询来衡量专家回复的新工具。

eConsult Specialist Quality of Response (eSQUARE): A novel tool to measure specialist correspondence via electronic consultation.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Canada.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2022 May;28(4):280-290. doi: 10.1177/1357633X21998216. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1177/1357633X21998216
PMID:33657913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9066665/
Abstract

High-quality correspondence between healthcare providers is critical for effective patient care. We developed an assessment tool to measure the quality of specialist correspondence to primary care providers (PCPs) via electronic consultation (eConsult), where specialists provide advice without specialist-patient interactions. We incorporated fourteen previously described features of high-quality eConsult correspondence into an assessment tool named the eConsult Specialist Quality of Response (eSQUARE). Six PCPs and two specialists applied the 10-item eSQUARE tool to 30 eConsults of varying quality as informed by PCP survey data. Content, response process, and internal structure validity evidence was gathered. Psychometric properties were calculated using descriptive statistics and generalizability analyses. Mean total score for low-quality eConsults (M = 24 ± 5.6) was significantly lower than moderate-quality eConsults (M = 38 ± 4.7; p<0.001) which was significantly lower than high-quality eConsults (M = 46 ± 3.0; p = 0.002). Reliability measures were high, including generalizability coefficient (0.96), inter-item (≥0.55) and item-total correlations (≥0.68). A decision study demonstrated that a single rater was adequate to achieve a reliability measure of ≥0.70. This study demonstrates initial validity evidence including multiple reliability measures for the eSQUARE. A single rater is adequate to achieve reliability measures for formative feedback. Future studies can apply the eSQUARE when planning educational initiatives aiming to improve specialist-to-PCP correspondence via eConsult.

摘要

医疗保健提供者之间的高质量沟通对于有效的患者护理至关重要。我们开发了一种评估工具,通过电子咨询(eConsult)来衡量专家与初级保健提供者(PCP)之间的专业通信质量,在这种咨询中,专家在没有专家-患者互动的情况下提供建议。我们将之前描述的 14 项高质量电子咨询通信特征纳入名为电子咨询专家响应质量(eSQUARE)的评估工具中。六名 PCP 和两名专家根据 PCP 调查数据,使用 10 项 eSQUARE 工具对 30 份质量不同的 eConsult 进行评估。收集了内容、响应过程和内部结构有效性证据。使用描述性统计和可概括性分析计算心理测量学特性。低质量 eConsults 的平均总分(M=24±5.6)明显低于中等质量 eConsults(M=38±4.7;p<0.001),而高质量 eConsults(M=46±3.0;p=0.002)则明显高于中等质量 eConsults。可靠性测量值较高,包括可概括性系数(0.96)、内部一致性(≥0.55)和项目-总分相关性(≥0.68)。决策研究表明,单个评分者足以达到≥0.70 的可靠性测量值。本研究证明了 eSQUARE 的初步有效性证据,包括多种可靠性测量值。单个评分者足以达到形成性反馈的可靠性测量值。未来的研究可以在规划旨在通过电子咨询改善专家与 PCP 之间的通信的教育计划时应用 eSQUARE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b5/9066665/e2cda2f937a8/10.1177_1357633X21998216-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b5/9066665/e2cda2f937a8/10.1177_1357633X21998216-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b5/9066665/e2cda2f937a8/10.1177_1357633X21998216-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
eConsult Specialist Quality of Response (eSQUARE): A novel tool to measure specialist correspondence via electronic consultation.电子咨询专家回复质量量表(eSQUARE):一种通过电子咨询来衡量专家回复的新工具。
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 May;28(4):280-290. doi: 10.1177/1357633X21998216. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
What makes a high-quality electronic consultation (eConsult)? A nominal group study.高质量电子咨询(eConsult)的特点是什么?一项名义群体研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 May;26(4):239-247. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18822885. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers.一项针对初级保健提供者的新电子咨询服务的影响及满意度:混合方法研究
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):394-403. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255.
4
Specialists accessing specialty advice: Evaluating utilization, benefits, and impact of care of an e-consultation service.获取专科建议的专科医生:评估电子会诊服务的使用情况、益处及护理影响。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jun;31(5):690-696. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231211352. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Insights into Specialists' Participation and Self-Reported Billing Times in a Multispecialty eConsult Service: Correlating Response Length with Outcomes and Satisfaction.多专科电子会诊服务中专家参与情况及自我报告计费时间的洞察:将回复时长与结果及满意度相关联
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):419-425. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0032. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on the Ontario eConsult Program.初级保健提供者对安大略省电子咨询项目的看法。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Sep;27(9):1039-1045. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0338. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
7
Ask the eConsultant: Improving access to haematology expertise using an asynchronous eConsult system.在线咨询顾问:利用异步在线咨询系统改善血液学专业知识的获取途径。
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Apr;23(3):421-427. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16644095. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Access to orthopedic specialist service in Ontario via eConsult.安大略省通过电子咨询获取矫形专家服务。
Can J Surg. 2022 Sep 28;65(5):E643-E649. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005820. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
9
Evaluation of an electronic consultation service for transgender care.评估电子咨询服务在跨性别护理中的应用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Mar 20;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01401-3.
10
Key Components of Traditional Consultation Letters and Their Relevance to Electronic Consultation Replies: A Systematic Review.传统会诊信函的关键组成部分及其与电子会诊回复的相关性:一项系统综述。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun;26(6):689-699. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0161. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Formalizing the curbside: digitally enhancing access to specialty care.规范路边服务:通过数字化手段增加专科护理的可及性。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2023 Aug 3;36(6):716-720. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2240364. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Establishment of Initial Validity Evidence for a Novel Tool for Assessing Trainee Admission Notes.评估住院医师入院记录新工具初始有效性证据的开发与建立。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1078-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05669-6. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Key Components of Traditional Consultation Letters and Their Relevance to Electronic Consultation Replies: A Systematic Review.传统会诊信函的关键组成部分及其与电子会诊回复的相关性:一项系统综述。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun;26(6):689-699. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0161. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Transforming the specialist referral and consultation process in Canada.
变革加拿大的专科转诊及会诊流程。
CMAJ. 2019 Apr 15;191(15):E408-E409. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181550.
4
What makes a high-quality electronic consultation (eConsult)? A nominal group study.高质量电子咨询(eConsult)的特点是什么?一项名义群体研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 May;26(4):239-247. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18822885. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Electronic Consultation Services Worldwide: Environmental Scan.全球电子咨询服务:环境扫描
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 21;20(12):e11112. doi: 10.2196/11112.
6
Electronic consultation impact from the primary care clinician perspective: Outcomes from a national sample.从基层医疗临床医生的角度来看电子咨询的影响:来自全国样本的结果。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep;25(8):493-498. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18784416. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
A Systematic Review of Asynchronous, Provider-to-Provider, Electronic Consultation Services to Improve Access to Specialty Care Available Worldwide.一项系统评价:异步、医患间的电子咨询服务,改善全球范围内获得专科医疗服务的途径。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Mar;25(3):184-198. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0005. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
Primary Care Practitioners' Perceptions of Electronic Consult Systems: A Qualitative Analysis.基层医疗从业者对电子咨询系统的看法:定性分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):782-789. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0738.
9
Specialist Perspectives on Ontario Provincial Electronic Consultation Services.安大略省省级电子咨询服务的专家观点。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jan;25(1):3-10. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0012. Epub 2018 May 10.
10
Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.从会诊医生的角度评估会诊信的重要组成部分:系统文献综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):948-954. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4356-3. Epub 2018 Mar 5.