Julião Miguel, Antunes Bárbara, Samorinha Catarina, Chochinov Harvey Max
Equipa Comunitária de Suporte em Cuidados Paliativos de Sintra, Sintra, Portugal.
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Feb;20(1):107-112. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000183.
Telephone availability is integrated into our home-based palliative care team (HPCT) with the aim of helping terminally ill patients and their caregivers alleviate their physical and psychosocial suffering, in addition to the team's home visits. We aimed to compare the differences between non-callers (patients with no phone calls during the team's follow-up period) vs. callers (≥1 phone call during the team's follow-up period) across sociodemographic, clinical, physical, and psychosocial variables.
Retrospective analysis of all patients with and without phone call entries registered in our anonymized database, from October 2018 to September 2020.
We analyzed 389 patients: 58% were male, and the average age was 71 years old; 84% had malignancies, with a mean palliative performance status of 45%. The majority of patients (n = 281, 72%) made at least one phone call to HPCT. On average, a mean of 2.5 calls (SD = 3.61; range: 0-26) per patient was registered. Callers compared with non-callers more frequently lived with someone (p = 0.030), preferred home as a place to die (p = 0.039), had more doctor (p = 0.010) and nurse home visits (p = 0.006), a prolonged HPCT follow-up time (p = 0.053), along with more frequent emergency room visits (p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (p = 0.043). Moreover, those who made at least one phone call to the HPCT had a higher frequency of conspiracy of silence (p = 0.046), anxiety (p = 0.044), and lower palliative performance status (p = 0.001). No statistically significant associations or differences were found for the other variables.
Several factors seem to correlate with an increased number of phone calls, and physical suffering does not play a relevant role in triggering contacts, in contrast with psychosocial and other clinical factors.
电话服务已纳入我们的居家姑息治疗团队(HPCT),目的是除团队家访外,帮助晚期患者及其照护者减轻身体和心理社会痛苦。我们旨在比较在社会人口统计学、临床、身体和心理社会变量方面,非呼叫者(团队随访期间无电话呼叫的患者)与呼叫者(团队随访期间有≥1次电话呼叫的患者)之间的差异。
对2018年10月至2020年9月在我们匿名数据库中登记的所有有和无电话记录的患者进行回顾性分析。
我们分析了389例患者:58%为男性,平均年龄为71岁;84%患有恶性肿瘤,平均姑息表现状态为45%。大多数患者(n = 281,72%)至少给HPCT打了一次电话。每位患者平均登记有2.5次电话呼叫(标准差 = 3.61;范围:0 - 26次)。与非呼叫者相比,呼叫者更常与他人同住(p = 0.030),更喜欢在家中离世(p = 0.039),接受医生家访(p = 0.010)和护士家访(p = 0.006)的次数更多,HPCT随访时间更长(p = 0.053),同时急诊就诊(p < 0.001)和住院(p = 0.043)更频繁。此外,那些至少给HPCT打了一次电话的患者,沉默共谋(p = 0.046)、焦虑(p = 0.044)的频率更高,姑息表现状态更低(p = 0.001)。其他变量未发现有统计学意义的关联或差异。
与心理社会和其他临床因素相比,有几个因素似乎与电话呼叫次数增加相关,而身体痛苦在引发联系方面并不起相关作用。