Suppr超能文献

实施全类风险评估与减灾策略(REMS)后患者对长效阿片类镇痛药安全使用的认知:一项调查研究

Patient Knowledge of Safe Use of ER/LA Opioid Analgesics Following Implementation of the Class-Wide REMS: A Survey Study.

作者信息

Esposito Daina B, Desai Vibha C A, Stephenson Judith J, Cepeda M Soledad, Lyons Jennifer G, Holick Crystal N, Wedin Gregory P, Lanes Stephan

机构信息

HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.

Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Feb 24;15:431-442. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S286935. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for extended release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioids in 2012. The purpose of this study was to assess patient knowledge of the safe use of these products following implementation of the REMS and to determine possible effects of the REMS, including impact on medication access.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient knowledge of safe use of ER/LA opioids and use of REMS patient education tools such as the Medication Guide (MG) and Patient Counseling Document (PCD).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey of commercially insured (Commercial) and Medicare Advantage-insured (Medicare) adults with ≥1 pharmacy claim for an ER/LA opioid (10/01/2015 - 02/28/2017) in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database and Medicaid-insured (Medicaid) adult members of a research panel, about their knowledge of safe use of ER/LA opioids and receipt/comprehension of the MG and PCD.

RESULTS

Survey respondents consisted of 382 Commercial, 43 Medicare and 40 Medicaid adults. While ≥95% of respondents received and read the MG, fewer were aware of the PCD (Commercial: 47%, Medicare: 65%, Medicaid: 53%). Almost 75% of the knowledge questions were answered correctly by ≥80% of all respondents; fewer respondents recognized that use of opioids as directed can lead to death (Commercial: 73%, Medicare: 56%, Medicaid: 63%), the MG should be read at each dispensing (Commercial: 78%, Medicare: 53%, Medicaid: 75%), opioids should not be stored in the medicine cabinet (Commercial: 77%, Medicare: 79%, Medicaid: 58%), missed doses should not be taken as soon as possible (Commercial: 56%, Medicare: 51%, Medicaid: 50%), and pills should not be crushed (Commercial: 85%, Medicare: 67%, Medicaid: 52%).

CONCLUSION

Although most respondents reported reading and understanding the MG and exhibited knowledge of safe use of ER/LA opioids, providers' use of the PCD and increased understanding of safe use core messages need reinforcement.

摘要

背景/基本原理:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)于2012年批准了一项针对缓释/长效(ER/LA)阿片类药物的风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)。本研究的目的是评估在实施REMS后患者对这些产品安全使用的了解情况,并确定REMS的可能影响,包括对药物可及性的影响。

目的

评估患者对ER/LA阿片类药物安全使用的了解情况以及对REMS患者教育工具(如用药指南(MG)和患者咨询文件(PCD))的使用情况。

方法

这是一项横断面调查,研究对象为在HealthCore综合研究数据库中有≥1次ER/LA阿片类药物(2015年10月1日至2017年2月28日)药房配药记录的商业保险(Commercial)和医疗保险优势计划保险(Medicare)的成年人,以及一个研究小组中医疗补助保险(Medicaid)的成年成员,调查他们对ER/LA阿片类药物安全使用的了解情况以及对MG和PCD的接收/理解情况。

结果

调查对象包括382名商业保险成年人、43名医疗保险成年人和40名医疗补助保险成年人。虽然≥95%的受访者收到并阅读了MG,但知晓PCD的受访者较少(商业保险:47%,医疗保险:65%,医疗补助保险:53%)。几乎75%的知识问题有≥80%的受访者回答正确;较少受访者认识到按指示使用阿片类药物可能导致死亡(商业保险:73%,医疗保险:56%,医疗补助保险:63%)、每次配药时都应阅读MG(商业保险:78%,医疗保险:53%,医疗补助保险:75%)、阿片类药物不应存放在药柜中(商业保险:77%,医疗保险:79%,医疗补助保险:58%)、漏服剂量不应尽快补服(商业保险:56%,医疗保险:51%,医疗补助保险:50%)以及药片不应碾碎(商业保险:85%,医疗保险:67%,医疗补助保险:52%)。

结论

虽然大多数受访者报告阅读并理解了MG,且表现出对ER/LA阿片类药物安全使用的了解,但仍需加强医疗服务提供者对PCD的使用以及对安全使用核心信息的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b433/7917306/4f48c96413b5/PPA-15-431-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验