Esposito Daina B, Cepeda M Soledad, Holick Crystal N, Knox Caitlin, Desai Vibha Ca, Liu Nianya, Vojjala Shiva-Krishna, Lyons Jennifer G, Wedin Gregory P, Lanes Stephan
HealthCore, Inc, Andover, MA, USA.
Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.
J Pain Res. 2020 Jan 16;13:157-169. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S219324. eCollection 2020.
The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for extended-release and long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics on 09 July 2012.
This study compared the incidence of opioid overdose before (July 2010-June 2012) and after (July 2013-September 2016) the initiation of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for extended-release and long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics. We identified patients with ≥1 ER/LA opioid dispensing in either time period in national data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD) and in United States (US) Medicaid claims data from four states. We described each population, calculated the incidence rate (IR) of opioid overdose, and assessed crude and propensity score adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing the overdose rate after vs before implementation of the REMS.
A total of 121,229 commercially insured and 11,488 Medicaid patients were included in the analysis. Rates of overdose were substantially higher in Medicaid patients than in the commercially insured patients (IR 192.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 162.60-225.18 versus 102.60, 95% CI 93.0-112.93 in the active period). The IRRs for opioid overdose were 1.01 (95% CI 0.87-1.17) in the commercially insured population and 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.93) in Medicaid.
This leveling off of overdose rates among commercially insured patients and decline among Medicaid patients is encouraging, but it is difficult to disentangle the specific impact of the REMS from many other ongoing initiatives with similar goals.
2012年7月9日,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)要求对缓释和长效阿片类镇痛药实施风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)。
本研究比较了缓释和长效阿片类镇痛药风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)实施前(2010年7月 - 2012年6月)和实施后(2013年7月 - 2016年9月)阿片类药物过量使用的发生率。我们从HealthCore综合研究数据库(HIRD)的全国数据以及四个州的美国医疗补助计划(Medicaid)索赔数据中,确定了在两个时间段内至少有1次缓释/长效阿片类药物配药的患者。我们描述了每组人群,计算了阿片类药物过量使用的发生率(IR),并评估了比较REMS实施后与实施前过量使用率的粗发病率和倾向评分调整发病率比(IRR)。
共有121,229名商业保险患者和11,488名医疗补助计划患者纳入分析。医疗补助计划患者的过量使用率显著高于商业保险患者(活跃期IR分别为192.0,95%置信区间[CI] 162.60 - 225.18和102.60,95% CI 93.0 - 112.93)。商业保险人群中阿片类药物过量使用的IRR为1.01(95% CI 0.87 - 1.17),医疗补助计划人群中为0.70(95% CI 0.52 - 0.93)。
商业保险患者中过量使用率趋于平稳,医疗补助计划患者中过量使用率下降,这令人鼓舞,但很难将REMS的具体影响与许多其他具有类似目标的正在进行的举措区分开来。