Karmarkar Roopali, Digesu Alex, Fernando Ruwan, Khullar Vik
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Imperial College London, London, UK.
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Mar;33(3):613-618. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04715-z. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
The study aims to compare the urethral sphincter size and bladder neck position and mobility in women with different parities.
Women referred to the urodynamics clinic for lower urinary tract and prolapse symptoms were included in the study. A detailed history was taken, and transperineal two- and three-dimensional ultrasound was performed on all the women. The women were divided into four groups according to the vaginal parity. Group 1 had no vaginal childbirths. Group 2 had one, group 3 had two and group 4 had three or more vaginal childbirths. The data was analysed and compared among the groups.
One hundred fifty women were included in the study. There were 34, 22, 48 and 46 women in groups 1 to 4 respectively. The distribution of different urodynamic diagnoses was similar in all four groups. The urethral sphincter measurements were significantly larger in the vaginally nulliparous group than in all other groups. The measurements were not smaller in multiparous women than in primiparous women. The bladder neck was at a lower position at rest in parous women than nulliparous women. The bladder neck movement was not more in groups 2 to 4 than in group 1.
The urethral sphincter was smaller and the bladder neck position was lower in parous women than nulliparous women. These differences were not progressive with increasing parity. Request for elective caesarean section during the second pregnancy to protect the urethra is not supported by this study.
本研究旨在比较不同胎次女性的尿道括约肌大小、膀胱颈位置及活动度。
纳入因下尿路及脱垂症状转诊至尿动力学门诊的女性。详细记录病史,并对所有女性进行经会阴二维及三维超声检查。根据阴道分娩次数将女性分为四组。第1组无阴道分娩史。第2组有1次,第3组有2次,第4组有3次或更多次阴道分娩史。对各组数据进行分析和比较。
150名女性纳入本研究。第1至4组分别有34、22、48和46名女性。所有四组不同尿动力学诊断的分布相似。未生育组的尿道括约肌测量值显著大于其他所有组。经产妇的测量值并不小于初产妇。经产妇静息时膀胱颈位置低于未生育女性。第2至4组的膀胱颈活动度并不比第1组更大。
经产妇的尿道括约肌较未生育女性小,膀胱颈位置较低。这些差异并不随胎次增加而加重。本研究不支持第二次妊娠时选择性剖宫产以保护尿道的要求。