Suppr超能文献

EBUS 引导下的小活检钳淋巴结活检:对诊断产量的影响。

Miniforceps EBUS-guided lymph node biopsy: impact on diagnostic yield.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension St. John Hospital, Michigan, United States.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Ascension St. John Hospital, Michigan, United States.

出版信息

Adv Respir Med. 2021;89(1):37-42. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2021.0024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the standard diagnostic method for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Non-diagnostic samples have led some pulmonologists to add a miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) in order to increase diagnostic yield. Our study aims to analyze the impact of adding EBUS-TBFB to the EBUS-TBNA in cases where Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) was negative for malignancy or was non-diagnostic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective chart review included 91 patients who were aged 18-90 years old and underwent EBUS with both TBNA and TBFB between January 1, 2013 and July 1, 2018.

RESULTS

There was no significant statistical difference in the diagnostic yield of TBNA vs TBFB with a McNemar value of 0.167, and this conclusion was the same when stratified by race, age and lymph node size. Using TBNA as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of TBFB was 87% and 69%, respectively. Out of the non-diagnostic TBNA samples on ROSE and cell-block, subsequent TBFB resulted in additional pathologic diagnoses in 16% of cases, of which 67% were non-caseating granulomas. Furthermore, two additional malignant cases were identified by TBFB consisting of small cell carcinoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, TBFB is a useful adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of non-malignant conditions (i.e. granulomatous diseases) with the potential to spare the patient from more invasive surgical biopsies. Training of future fellows in performing TBFB in addition to TBNA should be strongly encouraged.

摘要

简介

经支气管超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)是用于采样纵隔和肺门淋巴结的标准诊断方法。由于非诊断性样本的存在,一些肺病专家增加了微型活检钳活检(EBUS-TBFB)以提高诊断率。我们的研究旨在分析在快速现场评估(ROSE)为恶性或非诊断性时,添加 EBUS-TBFB 对 EBUS-TBNA 的影响。

材料和方法

本回顾性图表研究纳入了 91 名年龄在 18-90 岁之间的患者,他们于 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 1 日期间接受了 EBUS 检查,同时进行了 TBNA 和 TBFB。

结果

TBNA 与 TBFB 的诊断率之间没有统计学上的显著差异,McNemar 值为 0.167,当按种族、年龄和淋巴结大小进行分层时,这一结论也是相同的。使用 TBNA 作为金标准,TBFB 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 87%和 69%。在 ROSE 和细胞块上非诊断性的 TBNA 样本中,随后的 TBFB 在 16%的病例中导致了额外的病理诊断,其中 67%是非干酪样肉芽肿。此外,TBFB 还发现了另外 2 例恶性病例,包括小细胞癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤。

结论

总之,TBFB 是一种有用的辅助诊断工具,可用于诊断非恶性疾病(即肉芽肿性疾病),并有可能使患者免于更具侵袭性的外科活检。应强烈鼓励未来的研究员在进行 TBNA 的同时进行 TBFB 的培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验