Dziedzic Dariusz Adam, Peryt Adam, Orlowski Tadeusz
Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Research Institute of Chest Disease, Warsaw, Poland.
Clin Respir J. 2017 Jan;11(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/crj.12304. Epub 2015 May 26.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an accurate and minimally invasive technique that has been shown to have excellent diagnostic yield in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. However, endoscopic bronchial biopsy (EBB) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) are still the standard method for making a pathologic diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and TBLB through a flexible bronchoscope in patients with stage I and II sarcoidosis.
A total of 653 patients with suspected stage I and II sarcoidosis were included in this retrospective study. After radiological assessment, patients were qualified to bronchoscopy. Patients underwent sequential EBUS-TBNA followed by TBLB and/or EBB. In all patients, 1056 biopsies from mediastinal lymph nodes group were taken.
In all of the biopsied lymph nodes, positive results were obtained in 549 patients (84%). In 180 patients with stage II TBLB, a biopsy was taken from affected part of the lung. Positive results were found in 79 patients (43.9%). EBB was performed in 340 patients, with a positive result in 101 (29.7%). Mediastinoscopy was performed in 60 patients (9.2%) with a negative result in EBUS-TBNA, TBLB and/or EBB. Non-caseating granulomas were found in 48 patients. The sensitivity of TBLB technique alone was significantly lower at 43.9% (79/180) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of EBB was significantly lower than EBUS-TBNA and TBLB and reached 29.7% (101/340) (P < 0.0001, P < 0.003). The overall diagnostic accuracy for EBUS-TBNA was 84%, and the combination of EBUS-TBNA with standard bronchoscopic techniques had a diagnostic accuracy of 89%.
The diagnostic yield of the EBUS-TBNA for stage I and II sarcoidosis is clearly higher than for TBLB and EBB. The combination of EBUS-TBNA with standard bronchoscopic techniques is safe and feasible, and optimizes the diagnostic yield in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis and enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes. EBUS-TBNA in combination with standard bronchoscopy may be considered to be the first-line investigation in patients with suspected sarcoidosis and enlarged intrathoracic lymphadenopathy.
支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)是一种准确且微创的技术,已被证明在纵隔和肺门淋巴结病的诊断中具有出色的诊断率。然而,内镜下支气管活检(EBB)和经支气管肺活检(TBLB)仍是结节病病理诊断的标准方法。本研究的目的是比较EBUS-TBNA和通过柔性支气管镜进行的TBLB在I期和II期结节病患者中的诊断率。
本回顾性研究共纳入653例疑似I期和II期结节病的患者。经过影像学评估后,患者符合支气管镜检查条件。患者依次接受EBUS-TBNA,随后进行TBLB和/或EBB。在所有患者中,从纵隔淋巴结组获取了1056次活检样本。
在所有活检的淋巴结中,549例患者(84%)获得了阳性结果。在180例II期TBLB患者中,从肺部受累部位进行了活检。79例患者(43.9%)发现阳性结果。340例患者进行了EBB,101例(29.7%)结果为阳性。60例患者(9.2%)在EBUS-TBNA、TBLB和/或EBB结果为阴性时进行了纵隔镜检查。48例患者发现了非干酪样肉芽肿。单独TBLB技术的敏感性显著较低,为43.9%(79/180)(P < 0.001)。EBB的敏感性显著低于EBUS-TBNA和TBLB,为29.7%(101/340)(P < 0.0001,P < 0.003)。EBUS-TBNA的总体诊断准确率为84%,EBUS-TBNA与标准支气管镜技术联合使用的诊断准确率为89%。
EBUS-TBNA对I期和II期结节病的诊断率明显高于TBLB和EBB。EBUS-TBNA与标准支气管镜技术联合使用是安全可行的,并优化了肺结节病和胸内淋巴结肿大患者的诊断率。EBUS-TBNA联合标准支气管镜检查可被视为疑似结节病和胸内淋巴结肿大患者的一线检查方法。