Suppr超能文献

日常生活突发心源性死亡触发因素的公共卫生影响:系统评价和比较风险评估。

Public health impact of daily life triggers of sudden cardiac death: A systematic review and comparative risk assessment.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia; University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) may be triggered by daily circumstances and activities such as stressful psycho-emotional events, physical exertion or substance misuse. We calculated population attributable fractions (PAFs) to estimate the public health relevance of daily life triggers of SCD and to compare their population impacts.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus and the Web of Science citation databases to retrieve studies of triggers of SCD and cardiac arrest that would enable a computation of PAFs. When more studies investigated the same trigger, a meta-analytical pooled risk random-effect estimate was used.

RESULTS

Of the retrieved studies, eight provided data enabling computation of PAFs. The prevalence of exposure within population for SCD triggers in the control periods ranged from 1.06% for influenza infection to 8.73% for recent use of cannabis. Triggers ordered from the highest to the lowest risk increase were: physical exertion, recent cocaine use, episodic alcohol consumption, recent amphetamine use, episodic coffee consumption, psycho-emotional stress within the previous month, influenza infection, and recent cannabis use. The relative risk increase ranged from 1.10 to 4.98. By accounting for both the magnitude of the risk increase and the prevalence in the population, the present estimates of PAF assign 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-28.5) of all SCDs to episodic alcohol consumption, 9.4% (95% CI 1.2-29.3) to physical exertion, 6.9% (95% CI 0.3-25.0) to cocaine, 6% (95% CI 1.2-14.6) to episodic coffee consumption, 3% (95% CI 0.4-6.8) to psycho-emotional stress in the previous month, 1.7% (95% CI -0.9 to 12.9) to amphetamines, 0.9% (95% CI -4.9 to 12.5) to cannabis, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.2-0.4) to influenza infections.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to episodic alcohol consumption, a trigger with the greatest public health importance for SCD, episodic physical exertion, cocaine use and coffee consumption also show a considerable population impact.

摘要

背景

心脏性猝死 (SCD) 可能由日常情况和活动引发,例如紧张的心理-情绪事件、体力活动或物质滥用。我们计算了人群归因分数 (PAF),以评估 SCD 日常诱因的公共卫生相关性,并比较其人群影响。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 引文数据库,以检索可计算 PAF 的 SCD 和心搏骤停诱因的研究。当更多的研究调查了相同的诱因时,使用了荟萃分析的汇总风险随机效应估计。

结果

在所检索的研究中,有八项研究提供了可计算 PAF 的数据。在对照期内,SCD 诱因的人群内暴露率范围从流感感染的 1.06%到最近使用大麻的 8.73%。按照风险增加从高到低的顺序排列,这些诱因分别为:体力活动、近期可卡因使用、间歇性饮酒、近期安非他命使用、间歇性喝咖啡、最近一个月内的心理情绪压力、流感感染和最近使用大麻。相对风险增加范围为 1.10 至 4.98。通过同时考虑风险增加的幅度和人群中的流行程度,目前对 PAF 的估计将 14.5%(95%置信区间 [CI] 4.9-28.5)的所有 SCD 归因于间歇性饮酒、9.4%(95% CI 1.2-29.3)归因于体力活动、6.9%(95% CI 0.3-25.0)归因于可卡因、6%(95% CI 1.2-14.6)归因于间歇性咖啡饮用、3%(95% CI 0.4-6.8)归因于前一个月的心理情绪压力、1.7%(95% CI -0.9-12.9)归因于安非他命、0.9%(95% CI -4.9-12.5)归因于大麻,以及 0.3%(95% CI 0.2-0.4)归因于流感感染。

结论

除了对 SCD 具有最大公共卫生重要性的间歇性饮酒这一诱因外,间歇性体力活动、可卡因使用和咖啡饮用等诱因也具有相当大的人群影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验