Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Experimental Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):33-49. doi: 10.1159/000515631. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Our purpose was to perform a systemic literature review and meta-analysis regarding use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prediction of histopathological features in rectal cancer (RC) and to prove if ADC can predict treatment response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARC) in RC.
MEDLINE library, EMBASE, Cochrane, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and histopathology and/or treatment response in RC up to June 2020. Authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients, mean value, and standard deviation of ADC were acquired. The methodological quality of the collected studies was checked according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using the RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Overall, 37 items (2,015 patients) were included. ADC values of tumors with different T and N stages and grades overlapped strongly. ADC cannot distinguish RC with a high- and low-carcinoembryonic antigen level. Regarding KRAS status, ADC cannot discriminate mutated and wild-type RC. ADC did not correlate significantly with expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible factor 1a. ADC correlates with Ki 67, with the calculated correlation coefficient: -0.52. The ADC values in responders and nonresponders overlapped significantly.
ADC correlates moderately with expression of Ki 67 in RC. ADC cannot discriminate tumor stages, grades, and KRAS status in RC. ADC cannot predict therapy response to NARC in RC.
系统评价和荟萃分析直肠癌(RC)表观扩散系数(ADC)与组织病理学特征及预测新辅助放化疗(NARC)疗效的相关性,探讨 ADC 是否可预测 RC 患者对 NARC 的治疗反应。
检索 MEDLINE 数据库、EMBASE 数据库、 Cochrane 数据库和 SCOPUS 数据库,收集截至 2020 年 6 月有关 ADC 与 RC 组织病理学特征及治疗反应相关性的研究。提取文献的作者、发表年份、研究类型、纳入患者例数、ADC 值的平均值及标准差等信息。采用 Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies 工具评价纳入研究的方法学质量。采用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应模型计算合并效应量,以校正各研究间的异质性。计算 ADC 值的合并均数及其 95%置信区间。
共纳入 37 项研究(2015 例患者)。不同 T 分期、N 分期及分化程度肿瘤的 ADC 值重叠较大。ADC 无法区分高、低癌胚抗原水平的 RC。KRAS 状态方面,ADC 无法区分突变型和野生型 RC。ADC 与血管内皮生长因子、缺氧诱导因子 1a 的表达无明显相关性。ADC 与 Ki 67 表达呈中度负相关(r=-0.52)。应答者和无应答者的 ADC 值重叠较大。
ADC 与 RC 中 Ki 67 的表达呈中度相关。ADC 无法区分 RC 的肿瘤分期、分化程度及 KRAS 状态,不能预测 RC 患者对 NARC 的治疗反应。