Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/iebeldhuis.
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/pmyhre.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1211-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.057.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with spironolactone is associated with lower risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) but increased risk of worsening renal function (WRF). The prognostic implications of spironolactone-associated WRF in HFpEF patients are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between WRF, spironolactone treatment, and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: In 1,767 patients randomized to spironolactone or placebo in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial)-Americas study, we examined the incidence of WRF (doubling of serum creatinine) by treatment assignment. Associations between incident WRF and subsequent risk for the primary study endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, HFH, or aborted cardiac arrest and key secondary outcomes, including CV death, HFH, and all-cause mortality according to treatment assignment, were examined in time-updated Cox proportional hazards models with an interaction term. RESULTS: WRF developed in 260 (14.7%) patients with higher rates in those assigned to spironolactone compared to placebo (17.8% vs. 11.6%; odds ratio: 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.27 to 2.17; p < 0.001). Regardless of treatment, incident WRF was associated with increased risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 2.72; p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Although there was no statistical interaction between treatment assignment and WRF regarding the primary endpoint (interaction p = 0.11), spironolactone-associated WRF was associated with lower risk of CV death (interaction p = 0.003) and all-cause mortality (interaction p = 0.001) compared with placebo-associated WRF. CONCLUSIONS: Among HFpEF patients enrolled in TOPCAT-Americas, spironolactone increased risk of WRF compared with placebo. Rates of CV death were lower with spironolactone in both patients with and without WRF.
背景:使用螺内酯治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)与心力衰竭住院(HFH)风险降低相关,但肾功能恶化(WRF)风险增加。螺内酯相关 WRF 在 HFpEF 患者中的预后意义尚不清楚。
目的:本研究旨在探讨 WRF 与 HFpEF 患者螺内酯治疗和临床结局之间的关系。
方法:在接受螺内酯或安慰剂治疗的 TOPCAT(治疗保留心脏功能心力衰竭的醛固酮拮抗剂试验)-美洲研究的 1767 名随机患者中,我们根据治疗分配检查 WRF(血清肌酐加倍)的发生率。根据治疗分配,在时间更新的 Cox 比例风险模型中,使用交互项,检查 WRF 事件与心血管(CV)死亡、HFH 或心脏骤停中止的主要研究终点以及关键次要结局(包括 CV 死亡、HFH 和全因死亡率)之间的关联。
结果:260 名(14.7%)患者发生 WRF,螺内酯组的发生率高于安慰剂组(17.8%比 11.6%;比值比:1.66;95%置信区间:1.27 至 2.17;p<0.001)。无论治疗如何,WRF 事件与主要终点的风险增加相关(风险比:2.04;95%置信区间:1.52 至 2.72;p<0.001),经多变量调整后。尽管治疗与 WRF 之间在主要终点方面没有统计学交互作用(交互 p=0.11),但与安慰剂相关的 WRF 相比,螺内酯相关的 WRF 与 CV 死亡(交互 p=0.003)和全因死亡率(交互 p=0.001)的风险降低相关。
结论:在 TOPCAT-Americas 中纳入的 HFpEF 患者中,与安慰剂相比,螺内酯增加了 WRF 的风险。在有或没有 WRF 的患者中,螺内酯的 CV 死亡率较低。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021-3-9
JACC Heart Fail. 2019-1
JACC Heart Fail. 2018-7-11
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025-7-29
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025-4-29