Division of Cardiology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Reading Hospital-Tower Health System, West Reading, Pennsylvania, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):554-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.029. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The aim of this study was to examine the association between percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedural volume and in-hospital outcomes.
Several studies have demonstrated an inverse volume-outcome relationship for patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. Whether a similar association exists for percutaneous LAAO remains unknown.
Patients undergoing LAAO in 2017 were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals were categorized into 3 groups on the basis of tertiles of annual procedural volume: low (5 to 15 cases/year), medium (17 to 31 cases/year), and high (32 to 211 cases/year). Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to examine the association of hospital LAAO volume and outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse events (MAE), defined as a composite of mortality, stroke or transient ischemic attack, bleeding or transfusion, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, systemic embolization, and pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgery.
This study included 5,949 LAAO procedures performed across 196 hospitals with a median annual procedural volume of 41 (interquartile range: 25 to 67). Low-volume hospitals had higher rates of in-hospital MAE (9.5% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001), stroke or transient ischemic attack (2.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.049), and bleeding or transfusion (6.1% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.002) compared with high-volume hospitals. No differences were noted for other components of MAE and index length of stay. On multivariate analysis, higher procedural volume was associated with lower rates of in-hospital MAE, with an adjusted odds ratio for medium versus low volume of 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 1.04; p = 0.08) and for high versus low volume of 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 0.82; p = 0.003).
Higher hospital procedural volume is associated with better outcomes for LAAO procedures. Further studies are needed to determine if this relationship persists for long-term outcomes.
本研究旨在探讨经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAO)操作量与住院期间结局的相关性。
多项研究表明,接受有创性心脏手术的患者,其操作量与结局呈负相关。对于经皮 LAAO,是否存在类似的相关性尚不清楚。
在美国全国再入院数据库中确定了 2017 年接受 LAAO 的患者。根据年度操作量的三分位值,将医院分为三组:低(5 至 15 例/年)、中(17 至 31 例/年)和高(32 至 211 例/年)。采用多变量分层逻辑回归和限制立方样条分析来检验医院 LAAO 量与结局的关系。主要结局为住院期间主要不良事件(MAE),定义为死亡、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作、出血或输血、血管并发症、心肌梗死、全身栓塞以及心包积液或填塞需要心包穿刺或手术的复合事件。
本研究共纳入了 196 家医院的 5949 例 LAAO 手术,中位年度操作量为 41 例(四分位间距:25 至 67)。低容量医院的住院 MAE 发生率更高(9.5%比 5.6%;p<0.001)、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作发生率更高(2.1%比 1.3%;p=0.049)、出血或输血发生率更高(6.1%比 3.5%;p=0.002)。其他 MAE 组成部分和住院指数住院时间无差异。多变量分析显示,操作量较高与住院 MAE 发生率较低相关,中量与低量相比,调整后的比值比为 0.69(95%置信区间:0.46 至 1.04;p=0.08),高量与低量相比,调整后的比值比为 0.55(95%置信区间:0.37 至 0.82;p=0.003)。
医院操作量较高与 LAAO 手术的结局更好相关。需要进一步研究以确定这种关系是否与长期结局相关。